Sebi may amend norms on promoters' voting rights

Image
BS Reporter Mumbai
Last Updated : Jan 20 2013 | 12:00 AM IST

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) today said that it would initiate a consultative process to bring about necessary policy changes regarding prohibiting promoters from voting in the company general meeting on any resolution in which they themselves are interested in. The board also said that it would take view from market players and think over the issue of prohibiting an issue of warrants to promoters who have defaulted on their commitments to exercise their right to convert warrant.

Sebi took note of these concerns while hearing the case of petitioner Rajkot Saher Jilla Grahak Suraksha Mandal and another versus the Union Bank of India. The petitioner had also requested Sebi to investigate the manner in which decisions have been taken by the board of directors for allotment of warrants to the same promoters who had defaulted in their commitment earlier.

The petition had further said that Sebi should amend preferential issue guidelines to the effect that any preferential issue, including to promoters can only be of shares or convertible instruments on payment of full amount payable towards the issue. However, both these were rejected by Sebi.

The board was of the view that there were strict Sebi guidelines to prescribe the preferential issue of equity shares under Section 81(1A) of the Sebi Act. While no permission from Sebi is required for making preferential issues by listed companies, companies have to follow strict compliance norms with regard to disclosures, pricing, allotment of preferential shares, payment of subscription amount, tenor of convertibles, lock in period and other miscellaneous requirements. "Mere non-exercise of warrants by promoters or consequent fresh issuance of warrants to promoters does not appear to be in violation of Sebi act."

Moreover, Sebi is of the view that amending the Sebi guidelines to the effect that promoters can be allotted shares or convertible instruments on preferential basis only on the payment of full amount towards the issue would discourage the companies to raise funds through the allotment of warrants and also indirectly restrict the issue of capital to only shares of the company. "Such a step would disable a product which is accepted universally as a fund raising tool and restrictions on issuance of warrants may also deprive the operational and capital structuring flexibility for Indian companies," said Sebi disposing off the petition.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jul 30 2009 | 8:55 PM IST

Next Story