Currently, orders are passed by a single officer from one department. “To make orders a collective responsibility of the regulator and to prevent one officer from being singled out, we are mulling to have a panel to pass orders,” said a source.
Another source says this would increase the quality of orders and ensure different perspectives are taken into account while issuing these. “We want to have orders with more of quasi-judicial quality. Being passed by a panel would make sure these cannot be questioned easily,” added the person.
This was suggested by some independent members who are a part of the Sebi board of directors. Lawyers agree this would help improve the applicability.
“It will bring more perspective. Ideally, this panel should include at least three officers and one of them should be from a legal background. This will immensely improve jurisprudence of securities law. This is a practice followed by various tribunals,” said Vaneesa Agarwal, a law practice professional.
This comes in the wake of numerous Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and external agency inquiries on Sebi officials in the past two years. In the past year, 70 officials have been quizzed on action taken by them against entities and on corporate guidance.
“As these controversial orders were passed by a single officer, it was easy enough for the external agency to point fingers and single them out. With a panel passing interim, final and adjudicating orders, it would look like a combined Sebi decision and officers won’t be individually questioned,” said an official, on condition of anonymity.
Recently, Sebi officers had written to the chairman, highlighting the need for an institutional mechanism to handle such queries from external agencies.
Also, of late, many of its orders have been turned down by the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT). Though the overall success rate at SAT was 90 per cent in 2014-15, orders against some big corporate houses were criticised by SAT. For instance, those against Reliance Industries and Reliance Petro Investments, and one against DLF. Sebi’s stance in the matter of appointing the Institution of Mutual Fund Intermediaries as a self-regulatory authority for mutual funds was also criticised by the tribunal and it was directed to restart the entire process.
Recently, Sebi constituted a SAT cell, as a coordinating body between the regulator and SAT and for for better representation in front of the tribunal on Sebi orders.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)