Sebi showcause back to haunt RIL

Image
BS Reporter Mumbai
Last Updated : Jan 20 2013 | 12:21 AM IST

Amended notice asks why firm shouldn’t be barred from mkts.

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) has asked Reliance Industries Ltd (RIL) why the company should not be barred from accessing the stock markets under rules governing fraudulent and unfair trade practices, news agencies and television channels reported today.

The amendment (dated October 8) to the original showcause notice issued in April by the regulator’s investigation department further asks why directions should not be issued to bar the company from buying, selling and dealing in any security, directly or indirectly.

When contacted, Sebi spokesperson said the regulator “will not like to confirm or deny on matters related to investigation”.

The notice was issued in the matter relating to alleged insider trading in the shares of the now-defunct Reliance Petroleum, which had since merged with RIL.

When contacted, an RIL spokesperson said the company “has always abided by all the rules and regulations of Sebi and, hence, has neither violated any provision of insider trading nor acted in any manner so as to attract provisions under Section 11(i), 11(B) and 11(4) of the Sebi Act, 1992. We have, accordingly, submitted our detailed reply to Sebi and have not received any further communication in this regard.”

The matter pertained to the sale of shares of Reliance Petroleum by the parent company in November 2007 in two instalments of 2.54 per cent and 1.47 per cent each to raise Rs 4,023 crore.

The original showcause notice had sought disgorgement of proceeds earned by RIL from transactions in Reliance Petroleum shares.

RIL had sold over 4 per cent equity in RPL in November 2007, prior to which heavy selling by various group entities was noticed in the futures contract of RPL, the original notice said, adding that the gains made through these transactions could be Rs 513 crore. In the showcause notice, Sebi has also asked RIL and its 12 associate entities why action should not be taken against them under the Sebi Act and the Prevention of Fraudulent and Unfair Practices Regulation.

In February 2009, the government had informed Parliament, in reply to queries raised over charges of insider trading in shares of RPL, that Sebi was investigating the matter. Parliament was also informed that Sebi had received complaints of insider trading by as many as 19 companies, including RPL, over the past three years.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Nov 24 2009 | 12:10 AM IST

Next Story