Both companies have around 19,000 small shareholders, with holdings of less than Rs 1 lakh each, according to latest exchange filings.
The takeover regulations formulated by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) require an acquirer who buys shares in a particular company above prescribed limits, to make an open offer to buy a certain amount of shares from the public. Email questionnaires and repeated attempts to reach company officials did not elicit any response.
Market watchers said the Shree Rama case dates back to 2002, when Nirma had bought convertible notes of the former. In 2005, Nirma came to own 24.25 per cent after the company defaulted. It also announced an open offer. But it later wanted to revise the offer as the market price of the stock was much below the conversion price. The acquirers, then wanted to withdraw the open offer obligations, after alleging siphoning off of funds by the promoters.
On June 5, 2008, SAT upheld the Sebi order, saying Nirma Industries and Nirma Chemical Works tried to wriggle out of a bad bargain, not permissible under Regulation 27(1)(d) of the takeover code. Later, in November 2008, Nirma Group moved the Supreme Court.
In the case of Marg Limited the market regulator, Sebi, ordered the company to raise the open offer price four times, as the company was repeatedly involved in takeover code violations. Sebi asked the company to revise the open offer proposed at Rs 91 a share to around Rs 340. According to the merchant banker, the company has moved the Securities Appellate Tribunal .
Nisha Shah, associate director, Motilal Oswal Investment Advisors, said, “The company has not accepted the charges which are framed by Sebi and the matter is with SAT. We are waiting for the SAT order to go ahead and execute the open offer.”
Amish Tandon, a lawyer with Krishnomics Legal, a Delhi-based corporate law firm, said, “The regulations only provide for certain specified situations under which a public offer can be withdrawn. Further, recent orders of Sebi and SAT suggest that situations such as a fall in market price of shares of the target company would not constitute a valid ground for withdrawal of a public offer. Further, the Takeover Code does not consist of any provisions which allow downward revisions in the offer price. Additionally, it may be borne in mind that the offer price is to be determined with reference to the date of the public announcement with respect to the public offer by the proposed acquirer of the target company.”
“Going by the current position set out by Sebi and SAT, the acquirers may be required to complete the public offer. In such an event, the shareholders who have tendered their shares subsequent to a letter of offer would be recompensed at the price initially offered by the acquirers and not at any reduced amount,” adds Tandon.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)