However, what was earlier perceived as a potential disadvantage for these institutions is now working to their advantage. For instance, PFC garnered Rs 4,500 crore as loan prepayment from SEBs in FY16 and similar gains are expected in FY17. These prepayments are due to SEBs opting for financial aid under the UDAY or Ujwal Discom Assurance Yojana. REC benefited by Rs 10,000 crore in FY16 for the same reason.
Reports suggest PFC is likely to see loan prepayment of Rs 21,500 crore from SEBs participating in UDAY; for REC, the expected amount is Rs 35,000–40,000 crore. These will flow in over the next few years. Hence, in the near term, they provide higher earnings visibility, as the companies will be able to book interest income in their profit & loss statement. This is in contrast to the case if they'd opted for receiving bonds in lieu of the loans to SEBs, as the interest receivable would have not immediately reflected in the earnings.
Analysts also say while SEBs participating in UDAY could limit the fund utilisation for PFC and REC (given the loan prepayment), it at least helps arrest likely defaults on loan repayments. In fact, factoring for the benefit of delayed UDAY implementation, analysts at Edelweiss have revised their FY17 earnings per share estimate of PFC and REC upwards by six per cent and 23 per cent, respectively.
However, how these additional funds are used will guide the further course of re-rating. For now, the Street is not pleased with PFC and REC bailing out a few state-owned banks in FY16 by using the prepayment inflows and will be keeping an eye out for such transactions. A note by Jefferies says the investment by REC in (bonds of) Syndicate Bank, Vijaya Bank and Indian Bank are unhealthy. Analysts in Edelweiss are also cautious about the prepayment amount received by PFC being deployed towards buying bonds of Dena Bank and Andhra Bank. “Any similar usage of incremental prepaid amount will reflect negatively on the company”, the note warns.
PFC and REC have said there'd be increased loan disbursal towards renewable power projects but the Street will keenly gauge the progress on this front.
While these are the near-term tailwinds for PFC and REC that could give significant fillip to FY17 earnings, larger concerns on weak electricity demand and its underlying impact on declining disbursals towards power generation projects persist. These concerns could remain a medium-term overhang for the stocks, unless the companies can sustain loan growth by disbursing to related sectors like renewables.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)