Both the BSE and the National Stock Exchange (NSE) had approved the declassification last week.
Counsel representing the shareholders submitted that the reclassification was in violation of Listing Regulations. An informal guidance from Sebi had not been sought, and the reclassification was not approved by the shareholders in a general meeting, it was alleged.
However, SAT refused any immediate stay on the promoter declassification nod. According to the order, the transfer of shares from Arcelor to Sainath being an inter-se transfer between promoters, it appeared, prima facie, that an approval from the shareholders, as contemplated under Regulation 31A(5), would not apply to the present case.
It further said the fact that the two stock exchanges, without waiting for the informal guidance from Sebi, had approved the reclassification separately, and not jointly, could not be a ground to stay the impugned decisions of the NSE and the BSE, pending disposal of the appeal on merits. The tribunal will hear the matter on April 23.
A stay on declassification could have put ArcelorMittal’s rebid for Essar Steel in trouble. The date for rebid is April 2. In the first round, both Numetal and ArcelorMittal were found to be ineligible. Though legal advisors to ArcelorMittal were divided on the reasons for ArcelorMittal’s ineligibility, one view was that it was not eligible as it was not declassified from the stock exchanges as a promoter of Uttam Galva.
The world’s largest steel maker, however, came down heavily in the wake of minority shareholders moving SAT.
In a statement, the company said, “This is another obvious action to delay and complicate the process to find a new owner for Essar Steel India. Quite clearly, ArcelorMittal is not a promoter of Uttam Galva. We never considered ourselves a promoter as we had no management involvement or board representation and furthermore sold our shareholding. It is only natural, therefore, we should be declassified on the stock exchanges which has been done following the relevant processes.”
“We note the latest attempt to delay the process has not succeeded with bids to be submitted in April 2. ArcelorMittal plans to submit a bid as part of the revised offer process although we continue to believe our original offer is eligible. Our track record and long experience in the steel industry make us a highly credible bidder for Essar Steel India to be able to add value to the growth and development to the Indian steel industry,” it further said.
A source close to the company said the legal cost of the proceedings would far outweigh the value of the investment. The minority shareholders were understood to represent 0.04 per cent of Uttam Galva’s shares.
One subscription. Two world-class reads.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)