Advocate writes letter to CBI chief demanding further investigation in Bofors scam

Image
ANI Politics
Last Updated : Mar 17 2019 | 8:21 PM IST

Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader and advocate Ajay Aggarwal has written a letter to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) Director Rishi Kumar Shukla demanding further investigation in alleged Bofors scam.

Speaking to ANI, Aggarwal said: "I have written to CBI Director Rishi Kumar Shukla requesting that a further investigation in Bofors scam should be initiated immediately."

"Michael Hershman, one of the private investigators who had investigated this scam appeared on a private TV channel and said that he has a lot of things to say and wants to testify," he said.

"He also claimed that he was engaged by VP Singh, the then Finance Minister to investigate the case. During the probe, he found that some kickbacks were paid in some accounts," he said.

"After the investigation begun the then Prime Minister, Rajiv Gandhi got very furious and changed the ministry of VP Singh. He has said that if he is called he will make many exposes," added Aggarwal.

SC lawyer Aggarwal also levied strong charges against former CBI director Alok Verma and alleged that Verma had attempted to delay the case in connivance with Congress president Rahul Gandhi.

"After his revelation, CBI came out and said that reinvestigation will be done. And the then CBI chief Alok Verma forwarded an application in trial court to reinvestigate the case despite knowing well that no document is there in the trial court and all have been transferred to the Supreme Court," he said.

"He hatched this conspiracy with Rahul Gandhi to delay and scuttle the probe. There was no need of reinvestigation but of further investigation based on fresh facts that had emerged," claimed Aggarwal.

He also demanded a case to be registered against Gandhi and Verma in this regard.

Earlier in January, the Supreme Court had asked the locus standi of Ajay Aggarwal, in filing an appeal in the Bofors case. The court also said that it would be against criminal jurisprudence to permit a third party who is not connected to the case.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Mar 17 2019 | 7:22 PM IST

Next Story