Congress slams Govt. as AG asked to seek instructions on floor test in Uttarakhand

Image
ANI New Delhi
Last Updated : May 03 2016 | 1:42 PM IST

Don't want to miss the best from Business Standard?

With the Supreme Court asking Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi to seek instructions from the government on going ahead with a floor test in the Uttarakhand state assembly, former union minister and Congress MP Renuka Chowdhury on Tuesday said the BJP-led NDA Government at the Centre should ponder as to how they committed such a mistake in the hill state.

"Of course, they should think over it as to how such a decision was made and how they committed such a mistake," she told ANI outside Parliament.

Meanwhile, senior advocate K T S Tulsi said the ruling dispensation acted in haste as they knew that they would be defeated in the floor test.

"The government knew that they would be defeated in the floor test. So, they (the Congress government in Uttarakhand) were removed a day before," he said.

The Supreme Court has deferred till tomorrow the hearing on the Centre's appeal against the Uttarakhand High Court's verdict quashing imposition of President's rule in the state.

The apex court asked the Attorney General that there should be a floor test in the Uttarakhand Assembly under its supervision in view of the "Rameshwar judgement" and also asked the Centre to think about it.

An apex court bench headed by Justice Dipak Misra had on April 27 directed the continuation of President's Rule in Uttarakhand.

Posting the matter for further hearing on Tuesday, it had extended the stay on the High Court's order quashing the central rule in Uttarakhand.

The two-judge division bench, comprising of Justices Dipak Mishra and Shiva Kirti Singh, had also asked several questions to the Centre asking it to justify imposition of President's Rule.

The apex court sought to know if the Governor could have sent a message in the present manner under Article175 (2) to conduct a floor test and if delay in the floor test can be a ground for the proclamation of President's Rule in the state.

The apex court asked if disqualification of MLAs by the Uttarakhand speaker is a relevant issue for the purpose of imposing President's Rule under Article 356 and proceedings in the Uttarakhand assembly can be taken note of by the President for imposing his rule.

The Centre had imposed President's Rule in the state on March 27.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: May 03 2016 | 1:13 PM IST

Next Story