Delhi HC reserves order over plea seeking directives to stop J-K MPs from entering parliament

Image
ANI General News
Last Updated : Feb 03 2020 | 2:30 PM IST

The Delhi High Court on Monday reserved order on a plea seeking direction to stop the entry of lawmakers from the erstwhile state of Jammu and Kashmir in the Parliament, contending that they lost their locus standi as MPs after the bifurcation of the state into two union territories.

Meanwhile, Advocate Anil Soni, representing Ministry of Parliamentary Affairs told Justice Brijesh Sethi that this plea is not maintainable and should be rejected.

According to the petitioner, on August 5 2019, the state of Jammu and Kashmir was disbanded and in its place, two Union Territories were formed, therefore the MPs representing the State in the Rajya Sabha and Lok Sabha lost their locus standi to sit in the parliament.

The plea, filed by one professor from Jammu and Kashmir, Abdul Gani Bhat, who has sought that the 10 Members of Parliament from the erstwhile Jammu and Kashmir state should be stopped from entering and occupying seats in the parliament forthwith.

The petitioner, in his plea, said that MPs are representatives of the people of their States or Union Territories.

"But when there is no State or Union territory there cannot be any representation of that non-existent State or Union territory in the Indian Parliament. On 5th August 2019, the State of J-K was disbanded and in its place, two Union territories were formed. Accordingly, the MPs representing the State in the Rajya Sabha and Lok Sabha lost their locus standi to sit in the Indian Parliament," the petitioner said.

He further added that their continuation in the Parliament is illegal and unconstitutional for all practical purposes.

The petitioner said that Parliament of India abrogated the temporary Article 370 of the Constitution of India, cancelled separate constitutions, separate flag, separate laws and separate status of the State of Jammu and Kashmir and reorganised the State into two Union territories of Ladakh and Jammu-Kashmir.

"Thus the presence of the 10 members in the Indian parliament from the erstwhile State is immoral, illegal and unconstitutional," the petition said.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Feb 03 2020 | 2:18 PM IST

Next Story