El Chapo's defence lasts 15 minutes, 1 FBI officer testifies

Image
ANI US
Last Updated : Jan 30 2019 | 7:25 AM IST

Mexican drug kingpin Joaquin 'El Chapo' Guzman's defence began on Tuesday and was wrapped up in 15 minutes, with just one FBI officer taking the stand.

A "stipulation" from another witness, who was unable to appear in the court, was also read by the prosecution.

During the testimony, the lone FBI officer, agent Paul Roberts, discussed the notes he had taken while interrogating an informant in the case against Guzman. The stipulation provided testimony that a different informant had told investigators that Guzman was USD 20 million in debt, CNN reported.

On Monday, the prosecution rested its case after more than 50 witnesses were summoned. Tuesday was day 36 of the trial. The prosecution is scheduled to begin closing arguments on Wednesday.

After Tuesday's testimony, US District Judge Brian Cogan sent the jurors home and asked them to clarify if they can work out their schedules for deliberations to begin on Friday.

The defence is slated to make its closing arguments on Thursday morning, with the jury expected to receive its deliberation instructions later in the day.

Guzman is faced with a number of charges, including international drug trafficking, conspiring to murder rivals, gun charges, and money laundering.

His legal team asked the court on Monday to include in its jury instructions that the government's "proof at most establishes the existence of several separate and independent conspiracies" and not a single one. Prosecutors said that there are no grounds for multiple conspiracy charges.

The judge approved a prosecution motion to restrict the defence from claiming that Ismael "El Mayo" Zambada, who is believed to be one of the heads of the Sinaloa Cartel, paid the Mexican government to solely focus on Guzman.

"You can have two drug dealers, one of whom is paying off the government and one of whom is not. That does not mean the one who is not didn't do the crimes. I really have to stop you from making the argument because it's so misleading to the jury. It distracts them from the guilt or innocence of the defendant, which is what they have to determine," the motion quotes Judge Cogan's words from the second day of the trial.

The jurors have seen messages and listened to calls between Guzman and his associates, wherein he discusses drug trafficking and ordered executions.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jan 30 2019 | 6:50 AM IST

Next Story