Have faith in SC: Ram Madhav on Article 35 A

Image
ANI New Delhi (India)
Last Updated : Aug 06 2018 | 11:25 PM IST

After the Supreme Court adjourned hearing Public Interest Litigations (PILs) challenging the validity of Article 35A, Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) national general secretary Ram Madhav on Monday said one should have full faith in the Top Court's wisdom.

"Concerned people who are making a hue and cry about this whole process should remember that it is not political establishment but judicial establishment which is looking into the matter. Some NGOs have approached Supreme Court stating that 35A was inserted in Indian Constitution without due procedure being followed. This issue is before the Supreme Court and the court will look into different aspects of it and will take an appropriate view," he told ANI.

Meanwhile, Congress leader Saifuddin Soz said the article protects the people of Jammu and Kashmir, and should not be struck down.

"This article protects the people of Jammu and Kashmir, and you cannot remove it just because the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) wants it. The BJP and the RSS are the same, they are against Article 370. However, I am not in favour of adjournment. There should be a solution, as soon as possible," he said.

The Top Court was scheduled to hear a batch of petitions today, which challenge the validity of Article 35A of the Constitution, which grants special privileges to the residents of Jammu and Kashmir.

The Jammu and Kashmir government had on Friday moved an application before the top court and sought to defer the hearing of the case, citing upcoming panchayat and urban local body elections.

Article 370 of the Constitution grants special status to Jammu and Kashmir, while Article 35A disallows people from residing in Jammu and Kashmir, buying or owning immovable property in the state, settle permanently, or get state government jobs.

A non-governmental organisation, We the Citizens, filed a petitioned in the Apex Court in 2014 to abolish the law on the grounds that it was "unconstitutional".

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Aug 06 2018 | 11:25 PM IST

Next Story