India supports Russian-Chinese proposal at OPCW

Image
ANI The Hague [Netherlands]
Last Updated : Nov 21 2018 | 10:05 PM IST

India voted in favour of the Russian-Chinese proposal regarding Syria at the 23rd session of the Conference of State Parties (CSP) to the Organisation for Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) which concluded here on Tuesday.

The Russian-Chinese proposal sought to establish a working group to consider various proposals relating to the implementation of the decision on an Attribution Mechanism on the use of chemical weapons in Syria.

At the same time, India abstained from voting on the overall budget proposal of OPCW for 2019.

The Permanent Representative of India to OPCW Venu Rajamony made two separate Explanations of Vote (EOV).

India had previously voted against the decision to set up an Attribution Mechanism at the 4th Special Session of the Conference of States Parties.

"India believes the decision on the Attribution Mechanism has adversely impacted this finely crafted balance in the Convention by endowing unprecedented powers to the Technical Secretariat headed by the Director-General, in place of primacy and oversight of the Executive Council and the Conference of States Parties," an official statement said.

Therefore, Rajamony stated that India supported the Russian-Chinese proposal as it could "help rebuild the consensus amongst States Parties and overcome the divisions over the Attribution Mechanism".

Regarding abstaining from voting on the Budget proposal, the Permanent Representative stated that India had supported the amendments proposed by Iran to the Budget proposal.

India stated that despite the absence of consensus on the Attribution Mechanism, the country made the decision to abstain and not vote against because of its "abiding support" for the OPCW.

The Russian-Chinese proposal was rejected by the CSP with a vote of 82 against and 30 in favour out of 112 State Parties present at voting while the Program and Budget for the OPCW were adopted with a vote of 99 in favour and 27 against out of a total of 126 State Parties present at voting.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Nov 21 2018 | 10:05 PM IST

Next Story