The LGBT community has expressed hope that the Supreme Court would protect and legalise their sexual rights.
Array
"As a transgender person and activist, I along with many other of my brothers and sisters from the transgender and the LGBT community, repose our hope on the apex court that they would defend and protect the Constitution and the fundamental rights of all citizens of India, not excluding us," LGBT activist Vyjayanti Vasanta Mogli told ANI.
"We plead to the court not to undo the good that has happened through NALSA versus union of India. The lives of many others are entwined and dependent on this judgement. We plead to the court to dispense justice," Mogli added.
Array
Echoing similar sentiments, another LGBT activist Akai said they expect that there would be a positive verdict.
Array
Akai expressed her disappointment over the fact that hardly few of the parliamentarians know about this issue.
Array
"The parliamentarians are really uneducated and illiterates because they don't know about sex, gender and sexuality. Very few people like Arun Jaitley, P. Chidambaram wanted to take this issue. My question is how many of the parliamentarians will know about this issue?" Akai asked.
Array
The Supreme Court would hear, in an open court sitting, a curative petition filed by gay rights activists challenging its verdict "criminalising homosexuality" in the country.
Array
A bench headed by Chief Justice of India T.S. Thakur had earlier agreed to hear the curative petition against the apex court's December 2013 judgement upholding validity of Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), which criminalises sexual activities against the order of nature, arguably including the homosexual acts, and a January 2014 order by which it had dismissed a bunch of review petitions.
Array
The petitioners include NGO Naz Foundation, which works for the LGBT community.
The plea stated that the judgement was reserved on March 27, 2012, but a verdict was delivered after around 21 months. During this period, lots of changes took place, including amendment in laws, which were not considered by the bench which delivered the judgement.
Array
The gay rights activists had said thousands from the LGBT community became open about their sexual identity during the past four years after the Delhi High Court "decriminalised" gay sex in 2009, adding that they were now facing the threat of being prosecuted.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
