Pakistan's hypocrisy of sponsoring the same terrorists they claim to fight is a 'threat to regional and global security', says two Members of the European Parliament.
Well-known and respected think tanks such as the Brookings Institution have listed Pakistan as the "world's most active sponsor of terrorist groups."
"The propensity of the Pakistani authorities to shield terrorists is a problem for the international community, but it also wreaks havoc within their territory," said Jussi Halla-aho, who is a bureau member of the European Parliament's European Conservatives and Reformists Group (ECR) and Nicolas Bay, Co-Chair of the European Parliament's Europe of Nations and Freedom Group (ENF) in an article published in the Parliament Magazine.
"For decades, security experts have been aware that Pakistan has been acting as a 'safe haven' for terrorist organisations. Well-known and respected think tanks such as the Brookings Institution, have listed Pakistan as the "world's most active sponsor of terrorist groups," they noted.
Citing the US State Department, the leaders said that prior to 2016, the average number of civilian deaths occurring within Pakistan as a direct result of terrorism was approximately 3,000 people per year.
"The US State Department has also reported that Pakistan's half-hearted attempts to control militant groups are having "uneven" results. Pakistan has shown a profound hesitancy to address radicalisation in its madrassas (religious schools), its weak judicial system or its state funding of groups with extreme ideologies," they said.
Mentioning United States President Donald Trump's August 21st comments where he reproached the Pakistani government for harbouring terrorists and demanded they take responsibility for the consequences of their actions, Halla-aho and Bay said that US president's remarks marked the first time in seven decades that an American President has openly criticised the tyrannical, quasi-military dictatorship governing Pakistan.
"Trump acknowledged the hypocrisy of Pakistan sponsoring the same terrorists they claim to fight. Pakistan's hypocrisy in this realm is a threat to regional and global security. Trump also highlighted the billions of dollars of development aid Washington has been sending to Pakistan, implying he would cut off the funds meant for human rights and state-building if the country continues along this path," the two added.
Both said it is nonsensical for the USA to continue (indirectly) funding the very organisations they are fighting in Afghanistan and elsewhere.
However, Halla-aho and Bay asserted that any escalation between the USA and Pakistan - two of the world's nuclear powers - is unfortunate, and also Islamabad' state sponsorship of terrorist groups cannot go unheeded.
"Thus, an opportunity has been presented for the EU to act in accordance with cooperation principles it claims to be built upon," they added.
Quoting European Commission figures, the two said that the EU is Pakistan's most important trading partner, putting the EU in a strong negotiating position.
"Trade between the two has increased by over five per cent annually. Furthermore, Pakistan benefits from the EU's most profitable trade programme, the Generalised Scheme of Preferences (GSP+)," they noted.
"Under GSP+, Pakistani imports can enter Europe at tariffs significantly lower than those set out by the World Trade Organisation (WTO), allowing the country to profit and grow," the two added.
Emphasising that beneficiaries of GSP+ must be considered economically vulnerable due to low levels of economic diversity and lack integration with international markets, Halla-aho and Bay also mentioned that they must also comply with 27 "core conventions", seven of which address basic human rights principles.
"The opportunities of GSP+ are important for Pakistan's development, but equally important for the country's development is the security and well-being of its citizens. The international community cannot continue to turn a blind eye to Pakistan's wilful disregard of its own people," the two wrote.
Halla-aho and Bay further said that the international community cannot continue to disregard the impact these terrorist organisations have on the rest of the world, especially when European countries have to face terrorist attacks on their national soil.
"The country's disregard to the Islamic terrorism ripping through its cities is inexcusable," both said.
The two leaders maintained that Pakistan's well-documented support of terrorist organisations is a direct violation of a number of the GSP+ pre-conditions, as well as an assault on the "good faith" principles which are the building blocks of any international agreement.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
