A recent study has found that pesticide exposure in farm workers from agricultural communities is linked with changes in the oral microbiome.
In the study, the investigators sampled oral swabs from 65 farm workers and 52 non-farm worker adults from the Yakima Valley (Washington) community agricultural cohort during the spring and summer (2005), when farm workers can undergo high pesticide exposures while working in recently sprayed orchards, thinning the fruit and pruning; and during winter (2006), when exposures are quite low.
Concurrently, they measured blood levels of organophosphate pesticides in the study subjects.
The most important finding was that among those farm workers in whom the organophosphate pesticide, Azinphos-methyl was detected in the blood, the researchers found "significantly reduced abundances of seven common taxa of oral bacteria, including Streptococcus, one of the most common normal microbiota in the mouth," said first author, Ian B. Stanaway.
Changes in populations, species, and strains of Streptococcus, as well as from the genus, Halomonas, remained particularly low during the following winter.
The investigators also saw a pesticide-associated spring/summer general reduction in bacterial diversity in the study subjects, which persisted into the winter, suggesting that "long-lasting effects on the commensal microbiota have occurred," according to the report.
Predictably, farm workers had greater blood concentrations of pesticide, and greater changes in their oral microbiota than local, non-farm working adults.
"The challenge becomes, what does this mean," said principal investigator Faustman. "We don't know," she said, adding that "we depend on the micriobiome for many metabolic processes."
Nonetheless, "in other studies, changes in species and strains of Streptococcus have been associated with changes in oral health," noted Stanaway.
The study subjects' enthusiasm for the research has been important to its success, said co-author Beti Thompson. The investigators have followed the study participants for more than ten years, she said.
"They are very interested in all the effects of pesticides. They have contributed thousands of urine samples, tens of cheek cell samples, blood samples, saliva samples, and house and vehicle dust."
The research has been published in Applied and Environmental Microbiology, a journal of the American Society for Microbiology.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
