Pesticide exposure leads to changes in oral microbiome: Study

Image
ANI Washington D.C. [USA]
Last Updated : Nov 14 2016 | 5:32 PM IST

A recent study has found that pesticide exposure in farm workers from agricultural communities is linked with changes in the oral microbiome.

In the study, the investigators sampled oral swabs from 65 farm workers and 52 non-farm worker adults from the Yakima Valley (Washington) community agricultural cohort during the spring and summer (2005), when farm workers can undergo high pesticide exposures while working in recently sprayed orchards, thinning the fruit and pruning; and during winter (2006), when exposures are quite low.

Concurrently, they measured blood levels of organophosphate pesticides in the study subjects.

The most important finding was that among those farm workers in whom the organophosphate pesticide, Azinphos-methyl was detected in the blood, the researchers found "significantly reduced abundances of seven common taxa of oral bacteria, including Streptococcus, one of the most common normal microbiota in the mouth," said first author, Ian B. Stanaway.

Changes in populations, species, and strains of Streptococcus, as well as from the genus, Halomonas, remained particularly low during the following winter.

The investigators also saw a pesticide-associated spring/summer general reduction in bacterial diversity in the study subjects, which persisted into the winter, suggesting that "long-lasting effects on the commensal microbiota have occurred," according to the report.

Predictably, farm workers had greater blood concentrations of pesticide, and greater changes in their oral microbiota than local, non-farm working adults.

"The challenge becomes, what does this mean," said principal investigator Faustman. "We don't know," she said, adding that "we depend on the micriobiome for many metabolic processes."

Nonetheless, "in other studies, changes in species and strains of Streptococcus have been associated with changes in oral health," noted Stanaway.

The study subjects' enthusiasm for the research has been important to its success, said co-author Beti Thompson. The investigators have followed the study participants for more than ten years, she said.

"They are very interested in all the effects of pesticides. They have contributed thousands of urine samples, tens of cheek cell samples, blood samples, saliva samples, and house and vehicle dust."

The research has been published in Applied and Environmental Microbiology, a journal of the American Society for Microbiology.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Nov 14 2016 | 5:32 PM IST

Next Story