SC reserves order on rebel Karnataka MLAs plea challenging disqualification

Image
ANI General News
Last Updated : Oct 25 2019 | 7:45 PM IST

The Supreme Court on Friday reserved its verdict on petitions of 15 Karnataka MLAs challenging their disqualification by the state Assembly Speaker ahead of a floor test in June this year.

A bench headed by Justice N V Ramana reserved the judgement after a detailed hearing of arguments by the petitioners and respondents.

Senior lawyer Rajeev Dhavan, appearing for the Karnataka Speaker and Janata Dal (S), sought to refute the MLAs submission that the Speaker delayed his decision to take a decision on their resignation. "How are they (MLAs) saying that the Speaker deliberately delayed his decision on resignation?" he asked.

Dhavan said that the right to resignation was not absolute and the Speaker is entitled to consider whether the resignation foreshadows a pre-emptive effect when an MLA is trying to escape consequences of his actions.

Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for Congress, told the bench that the matter needs to be referred to a Constitution Bench. "It raises matters of grave constitutional importance," he submitted before the bench.

He said that the court needs to interpret what "genuineness" of a resignation means.

"Cannot allow MLAs to subvert the system and resign a day before floor test because he wants to be a minister," Sibal argued, adding that "intention and motive of the MLAs must be considered by the Speaker while conducting an inquiry".

Senior advocate Rakesh Dwivedi, appearing for the Election Commission (EC), said, "there are certain provisions in Representation of People's (RP) Act, which states that the Speaker's jurisdiction ends after taking a call on disqualification."

The court was hearing arguments on the petition filed by 15 rebel Congress-JD (S) MLAs challenging the then Speaker KR Ramesh Kumar's order of disqualifying them from the assembly.

The EC had earlier deferred the assembly bypolls in Karnataka to December 5 as the case pertaining to the disqualification of 17 MLAs from the state is sub judice in the Supreme Court.

The 17 MLAs were disqualified in July by Ramesh Kumar and barred from contesting polls for the duration of the assembly, which ends in 2023. It had led to the fall of the Congress-JD (S) coalition government in the state.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Oct 25 2019 | 7:36 PM IST

Next Story