Putting a stamp of confirmation over the UPA Government's move to replace former solicitor general of India Harish Salve with Pakistan counsel Khawar Qureshi to represent India's stance in the Dabhol Power Corporation case back in 2004, senior lawyer Aman Sinha said that Salve indeed told him he was counselling for the matter initially, but was later replaced.
"Harish Salve told me that he was appearing initially. When the Congress Government came, he was replaced by Khawar Qureshi, the same counsel who he defeated at the International Court of Justice's (ICJ) recent hearing moving to stall the execution of Kulbhushan Jadhav," Sinha told ANI.
Questioning the need to facilitate Salve's replacement, Sinha said it was surprising to note that the former was replaced by a counsel who not only charged a lump sum amount as his fee, but was also known for his 'track record for losing'.
"India was winning the case with Harish Salve. When the Congress took over, he was replaced by Khawar Qureshi. In the En Ron matter of the Dabhol Power Corporation matter, India lost the crucial case. There was no need for replacement," he said.
Sinha added that it was 'ironical' for the Centre to appoint someone who was not of Indian origin.
Meanwhile, advisor to Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif on Foreign Affairs Sartaj Aziz reiterated Pakistan's stand that Kulbhushan Jadhav cannot be acquitted by the ICJ, adding that his punishment would be in accordance with domestic laws.
Commenting on this, Sinha, while drawing upon Article 59 of the ICJ, asserted that it was binding on Pakistan to comply with all the appropriate norms and take all necessary measures.
"Pakistan cannot deny compliance, since doing so would result in a strict action. The whole United Nations Security Council is there to back the ICJ. As far as India's stand is concerned, the case will be handled appropriately," said Sinha.
Earlier, it was reported that the Congress-led UPA government had hired Pakistan's Khawar Qureshi to represent India in the Dabhol Power Project case back in 2004 at the International Court of Arbitration.
It's said that when the UPA came to power, they changed the entire legal team that would appear on behalf of the Indian Government.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
