Supreme Court to hear case of implementation of Advocates Act in J&K

Image
ANI New Delhi [India]
Last Updated : Jan 30 2017 | 9:13 PM IST

Supreme Court will hear a writ petition filed by Prof. Bhim Singh, seeking implementation of Advocates Act in J&K. Prof. Bhim Singh, in his petition, has urged the Supreme Court of India to issue direction to the Union of India to issue notification/order declaring that J&K shall have elected Bar Council of J&K as is applicable in all other states of the country.

The Division Bench headed by Chief Justice, Mr. Justice J.S. Khehar declared that the Supreme Court shall hear the writ petition on February 3, 2017. Chief Justice, Justice Jagdish Singh Khehar decided to hear the matter finally on February 3, 2017. He told the counsel for the Bar Council that it shall be argued that day finally.

Prof. Bhim Singh, while arguing the writ petition, made emotional submission before the court that he is a Member of the Bar Council of J&K which is governed by the High Court Judges under the Chairmanship of the Chief Justice of J&K right since the application of the Act in J&K which amounts to discrimination with the Advocates of J&K. The counsel for the Bar Council of India had agreed before the Supreme Court to complete all formalities in this direction. Even draft Constitution was proposed by the Bar Council of India and after some amendments approved by the High Court of J&K.

Prof. Bhim Singh expressed surprise that the Bar Council took a 'U' turn on the advice of the Union of India which submitted before the Supreme Court that situation to hold election for the Bar Council in J&K was not conducive. Arguing strongly Prof. Bhim Singh made a submission before the Supreme Court that the election to the Parliament and Assembly should also be postponed if situation to hold lawyers' election is so bad.

Prof. Bhim Singh argued strongly that he is Member of Bar Council of J&K which is presided over by the Chief Justice of J&K with the judges of J&K High Court as its member. Prof. Bhim Singh argued before the a division bench headed by the Chief Justice of India that the lawyers in J&K should not be denied their right to elect the Council for them as is done throughout the country in all other states.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jan 30 2017 | 8:36 PM IST

Next Story