Congress on Friday said that it will "fearlessly and firmly give a befitting reply" in court over plea filed in Delhi High Court seeking registration of FIRs against senior party leaders and also took a dig at the Centre over FIRs not having been registered against BJP leaders over their alleged objectionable remarks.
Addressing a press conference here, Congress leader Abhishek Manu Singhvi said the party will seek dismissal of the plea in the court.
"We will give an extremely strong, befitting, comprehensive and straight-forward reply, but let me tell you that the whole world is receiving FIRs but the whole world does not include Kapil Mishra, Anurag Thakur and Parvesh Verma, not even an FIR now after months. And of course after years, not an FIR against Giriraj Singh, against Chinmayanand, against Sangeet Som," he said.
Taking a swipe at the Centre, Singhvi said sarcastically that the speeches of BJP leaders were "very mild" compared to those of party leaders Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi.
"Surely, their speeches were very mild compared to the hate and venom spewed out by Priyanka Gandhi Vadra, Rahul Gandhi and Sonia Gandhi. By the way, we have not seen which speech has so much hate and venom that it deserves an FIR and their speeches, which we have all seen on TV, don't deserve an FIR," he said.
He also cautioned the courts to follow their own rules concerning public interest litigations.
"I would, with the greatest of respect but with equal firmness, caution the courts that they have to follow their own rules... Notice is not automatic and should never be automatic in PILs... We will fearlessly, boldly and firmly give a befitting reply in court and ask for it to be dismissed with exemplary costs," he said.
The Delhi High Court on Friday issued notices to the Centre, Delhi government and Delhi Police on a petition seeking registration of FIR against Congress leaders Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi and Priyanka Gandhi Vadra, AAP leader and Delhi Deputy Chief Minister Manish Sisodia and others over alleged hate speech.
A division bench of Chief Justice DN Patel and Justice C Hari Shankar asked the respondents to file their reply on the petition and listed the matter for further hearing on April 13.
The plea, filed by a group, Lawyers Voice, sought directions to constitute a Special Investigation Team (SIT). The petition also sought appropriate action against these leaders. .
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
