A mere "black"-sounding name makes people imagine a larger, more dangerous person, finds a new study that explores racial bias and how people use their mind's eye to imagine someone as either threatening or high-status.
The University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA) study sought to understand how the human brain's mechanism for interpreting social status evolved from the same mental systems that our early ancestors originally used to process threats.
In a series of studies involving more than 1,500 people, the researchers found that an unknown black male is conceived of similarly to an unknown white male who has been convicted of assault.
"I've never been so disgusted by my own data," said lead author Colin Holbrook from UCLA.
"The amount that our study participants assumed based only on a name was remarkable. A character with a black-sounding name was assumed to be physically larger, more prone to aggression, and lower in status than a character with a white-sounding name," Holbrook said.
During one version of the study, the mostly white participants, aged 18 to mid-70s, from all over the United States and self-identifying as slightly left-of-centre politically, read one of two nearly identical vignettes.
One featured a man named Jamal, DeShawn or Darnell, and the other featured Connor, Wyatt or Garrett. The monikers selected were based on prior research into names most commonly associated with various ethnic groups.
In all versions of the study, participants were asked their intuitive impression of the character's height, build, status, aggressiveness and other factors.
"In essence, the brain's representational system has a toggle switch, such that size can be used to represent either threat or status," said co-author and UCLA anthropology professor Daniel Fessler.
"However, apparently because stereotypes of black men as dangerous are deeply entrenched, it is very difficult for our participants to flip this switch when thinking about black men."
For study participants evaluating black protagonists, dangerous equals big and big equals dangerous, period," Fessler added.
The study was published in the journal Evolution and Human Behaviour.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
