Controversy over Akbar's 'Navratnas' installation in heritage site

Image
IANS Agra
Last Updated : Mar 06 2015 | 5:28 PM IST

A controversy has erupted over divisional commissioner Pradip Bhatnagar's decision to install the statues of Mughal emperor Akbar's "Navratnas" (nine jewels) in Fatehpur Sikri, a World Heritage site.

Akbar's passion for knowledge and interest in learning from great minds led him to attract men of genius to his court. His personal favourites were collectively known as the nine gems or "Navratnas".

Bhatnagar, using funds from the Agra Development Authority, ordered the statues of the nine jewels to be put up at the site.

But now historians are asking him to present historical evidence that Akbar had appointed or released officially a list of nine jewels in his court, to counsel him and provide him with informed company.

Eminent Mughal historian R. Nath told IANS: "To my knowledge there is no authentic list of nine jewels in any work of a contemporary historian. Its part of the popular folklore though."

"The Archaeological Survey of India should strictly follow the manuals and the 1958 Ancient Monuments Act, which does not permit addition or deletion of any new structures," Nath added.

The nine jewels, according to popular belief are: Abul Fazl, Abdul Rahim Khan-I-Khana, Birbal, Mulla Do-Piyaza, Faizi, Raja Man Singh, Raja Todar Mal, Faqir Azio Din and Tansen.

Bhatnagar, who is also the chairman of the Agra Development Authority, initiated a project to get statues made of all the nine jewels and put them on show at the Fatehpur Sikri complex. But the Archaeological Survey of India has refused permission. The statues will now be installed in the Uttar Pradesh tourism facilitation centre outside the complex.

Historian Raj Kishore Raje told IANS: "Commissioner Bhatnagar is distorting history. I have written to the Uttar Pradesh chief minister advising him to restrain the commissioner from proceeding in this matter."

Raje said there is no mention in any of the books of the period. Abul Fazal's "Ain-e-Akbari", Farishta's "Tareekh-e-Farishta", Innyatullah's "Taqmeel-e-Akbarnama", say nothing about the nine jewels of Akbar.

"Even the books of Sir Jadu Nath Sarker or Ashirwadi Lal Srivastav make no mention of them. Akbar never said he had capable hands to help him in administration. Therefore, if the commissioner goes ahead with his statue project, it would be a travesty of truth and misrepresentation of history."

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Mar 06 2015 | 5:24 PM IST

Next Story