Court declines to restrain Ansals from flying abroad

Image
IANS New Delhi
Last Updated : Mar 16 2017 | 6:49 PM IST

A Delhi court on Thursday refused to pass any order on prosecution's plea seeking curbs on Ansal brothers from moving out of the country, in a case of alleged tampering with evidence in the 1997 Uphaar fire tragedy.

Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (CMM) Sumit Dass observed that Ansal brothers Sushil and Gopal had challenged the order on the charges framed against them for allegedly tampering with evidence in the Uphaar tragedy case in the Delhi High Court.

The defence counsels of Ansals brothers informed the CMM that the Delhi High Court had reserved its order on their plea challenging trial court's order, dated May 31, 2014, and requested the judge to wait for the High Court's decision.

The court said that it could not pass any observation as the case files were in the possession of the High Court.

The magistrate told the prosecution that it could move the plea seeking restraining of the Ansal brothers from moving out of the country before the Delhi High Court.

Earlier in the day, Public Prosecutor A.T. Ansari requested the court to impose condition on the Ansal brothers that they could not fly abroad without permission. He apprehended that Ansals would flee the legal clutches.

The trial court in 2014 framed charges against the seven accused, including Ansal brothers, under various provisions of the Indian Penal Code -- 109 (abetment of offence), 201 (causing disappearance of evidence), 409 (criminal breach of trust by public servant) and 120-B (criminal conspiracy).

Theatre owners Gopal Ansal, his brother Sushil Ansal, Anoop Singh, Prem Prakash Batra, Harswaroop Panwar, Dharamveer Malhotra as well as a court employee, Dinesh Chandra Sharma, are accused of tampering with evidence in the case, pending since 2006.

On June 13, 1997, when the Hindi film "Border" was being screened, a fire engulfed the theatre, killing 59 people and injuring over 100. The fire was sparked by a blast in a transformer in an underground parking lot in the five-storey building which housed the cinema hall and several offices.

A court on Jan 31, 2003 ordered an inquiry after some documents related to the Uphaar case went missing from the court record room. After an inquiry, the judge dismissed a court employee.

--IANS

akk/nir

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Mar 16 2017 | 6:40 PM IST

Next Story