The Supreme Court was on Wednesday urged to decide whether a Chief Minister accountable to a democratically elected assembly and the people or the President's nominee Lt Governor was the primary authority to govern the national capital.
"You have to decide which is the primary authority -- one that is directly elected or the Lt Governor," senior counsel Rajiv Dhavan, appearing for the Delhi government, told a Constitution Bench comprising Chief Justice Dipak Misra, Justice A.K. Sikri, Justice A.M. Khanwilkar, Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, and Justice Ashok Bhushan.
Dhavan told the bench: "If we go by the principle of parliamentary democracy, then the Chief Minister is the primary authority heading a responsible government answerable to the legislature and the people".
The bench was told that the "Delhi government was a creation of the Constitution (created under Article 239AA) in exercise of the constitutional powers of Parliament and as such stood on a different footing".
"It (Delhi government) is not a gift of any law. It is a gift of the Constitution itself," Dhavan told the bench hearing a batch of petitions by the Delhi government challenging the Delhi High Court order holding that the Lt Governor had the final authority in the governance of Delhi.
Telling the bench that proviso 4 to Article 239AA has to be read as whole, as it does not depend on any one word (used therein), Dhavan asked: "Does he (Lt Governor) have veto power. He is a representative of the President."
"There is a legislative assembly, endowed by the Constitution. It has the power over the State list and the Concurrent list as well."
"There is a role of the Lt Governor and the role of the Chief Minister -- both have to be reconciled. Keeping in mind that the Lt Governor is a representative of the President," Dhavan said, emphasising that as "elected Chief Minister, he has both executive and implementing powers. All decisions are carried in the name of the Lt Governor because of the Rules of Procedure, that is why there is aid and advice in the proviso 4 of Article 239AA of the Constitution."
Dhavan will continue his arguments.
--IANS
pk/tsb/dg
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
