Delhi HC sets aside government decision to cap condom prices

Image
IANS New Delhi
Last Updated : Jul 10 2015 | 11:42 PM IST

The Delhi High Court on Friday set aside the government's decision to bring condoms under the Drug Price Control Order (DPCO), which has put a cap on prices of all male contraceptives in the country, terming the order "illegal and unsustainable".

A bench of Chief Justice G. Rohini and Justice Rajiv Sahai Endlaw set aside the November 5, 2013 and July 10, 2014 orders of National Pharmaceutical Pricing Authority (NPPA) placing a ceiling on the prices of condoms, as this was impermissible under law.

The court order came on a plea filed by by pharmaceutical giant Reckitt Benckiser (India) Pvt Ltd and J.K. Ansell Ltd (JKAL) seeking to quash the government notification of November 2013 that put a cap on the price of male contraceptives sold in the country, contending that it would force the manufacturers to sell their product below the actual cost.

The government had in May last year included condoms in the list of essential medicine and fixed its ceiling price.

Reckitt Benckiser, opposing the inclusion of condoms within the scope of DPCO, claimed that condoms came under the category of "devices" and not "medicine".

The manufacturers have also questioned the methodology for fixing the ceiling price, arguing that the low ceiling price will force bigger companies to stop production, which in turn will have a negative effect on population control measures.

However, the central government said that since condoms help to prevent diseases, they came under the classification of "medicines" and, hence, their prices can be controlled by the government.

"In the light of the settled legal position, we are of the view that the policy decision of the government to control the price of the condom which is admittedly an essential commodity having been taken keeping in view various social, economic and commercial factors is not amenable for judicial review by this court," the court said.

"What is the best in the interest of the general public is a matter for decision exclusively within the province of the central government."

"It is no doubt true that before making a control order, it is mandatory for the central government to form an opinion that it is necessary or expedient to make an order for the purpose of maintaining or increasing supplies of any essential commodity or for securing their equitable distribution and availability at fair prices," the court said adding, however, it cannot be concluded that the government failed to form such opinion merely on the ground that 55 percent of the condoms are available free or at subsidized prices.

--Indo-Asian News service

akk/vd

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jul 10 2015 | 11:30 PM IST

Next Story