'Greener' alternatives may be harmful too

Image
IANS Toronto
Last Updated : Mar 06 2015 | 2:22 PM IST

Transitioning from fossil fuels to electric-powered technology is widely believed to be the best way to lower carbon emissions.

But is that the real solution? Certainly not, especially in India and China, warns a new study.

"Knowing where the electricity comes from to power those 'eco-alternatives' is critical," said researcher Chris Kennedy of the University of Toronto.

"If that electricity comes from burning oil and coal, it might mean that green alternatives aren't that green after all," he added.

Although regions may welcome 'green' technology like electric vehicles, high-speed rail and geothermal heating, they aren't green if the electricity to power them creates even more carbon emissions than their oil-driven counterparts, the researcher said.

Kennedy's study proposes a new decision-making threshold for when to move from fossil fuel technology to electric power.

It says that a region needs to produce its electricity at a rate below the threshold - approximately 600 tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent per gigawatt hour (GWh).

This means that for every gigawatt hour of electricity generated (the power needed to run about 100 homes for a year), less than 600 tonnes of greenhouse gases (measured as 'CO2 equivalent') can be emitted.

If a region's electricity production exceeds this 600-tonne threshold, such as in countries like India, Australia and China, electrification could actually increase carbon emissions and accelerate climate change, the study warned.

"Countries such as these generate much of their electricity using coal, which produces about 1,000 tonnes of CO2 equivalent per GWh - nearly double the suggested threshold," the researcher said.

Natural gas, on the other hand, produces 600 tonnes, and hydropower and nuclear energy produce nearly zero.

"You could speculate that incorporating electrified technologies such as high speed rail in China may not lower overall emissions. It might even be more carbon friendly to fly," Kennedy said.

The study was published in the journal Nature Climate Change.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Mar 06 2015 | 2:12 PM IST

Next Story