Haryana will go ahead with urban local bodies elections as scheduled, as the Supreme Court on Tuesday stayed the Punjab and Haryana High Court order asking the State Election Commission to invite fresh objections against deletion of names from electoral rolls and reschedule of the date of filing nomination papers.
With the high court order stayed, the elections to 15 municipal councils and 28 municipal committees will now take place as scheduled on May 22.
The vacation bench of Justice Abhay Manohar Sapre and Justice Ashok Bhushan stayed the operation of May 12 high court order after Additional Solicitor General Tushar Mehta told the court that election process has already on and voting was to take place on May 22. It also issued notice to Suman Lata, on whose petition the high court order came.
The high court had asked the State Election Commission and the principal secretary, urban and local bodies department and the deputy commissioner, Kurukshetra "to invite a fresh objections against deletion of names from the electoral rolls by giving one day opportunity to the affected voters and thereafter re-schedule the election programme including the date for filing nominations papers so as to enable the affected persons including the petitioners to file nominations, if so desired".
However, it had said that "authorities shall be at liberty to hold the election as per the final date of election already notified".
The Haryana State Election Commission has contended the high court order was contradictory as on one hand, it directs inviting fresh objections against deletion of names and on the other, allows the authorities to hold elections as per the dates already notified.
Suman Lata, a resident of Kurukshetra, wanted to contest the election for urban local body but found that her name was deleted from the electoral roll.
Claiming that she had voted in the last assembly elections, she made a representation to deputy commissioner, Kurukshetra for inclusion of her name in the voters list so that she could file her nomination papers. But her request was rejected and she then moved the high court.
--IANS
pk/vd
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
