Using a massive data set of many billions of words based on actual usage, researchers from the University of Vermont have revealed the universal human bias for using positive words.
Movie subtitles in Arabic, Twitter feeds in Korean, the famously dark literature of Russia, websites in Chinese, music lyrics in English, and even the war-torn pages of the New York Times -- the researchers found that these, and probably all human languages, skew toward the use of happy words.
"We looked at 10 languages and in every source we looked at, people use more positive words than negative ones," said mathematician Peter Dodds who co-led the study.
In 1969, two psychologists at the University of Illinois proposed what they called the Pollyanna Hypothesis - the idea that there is a universal human tendency to use positive words more frequently than negative ones.
"Put even more simply," they wrote, "humans tend to look on (and talk about) the bright side of life."
It was a speculation that has provoked debate ever since.
For the new study, the team of scientists with support from the US National Science Foundation and the non-profit Mitre Corporation gathered billions of words from around the world using 24 types of sources.
The sources were books, news outlets, social media, websites, television and movie subtitles, and music lyrics.
In all cases, the scientists found "a usage-invariant positivity bias", as they wrote in the study.
In other words, by looking at the words people actually use most often they found that, on an average, we "use more happy words than sad words", added mathematician Chris Danforth who co-led the new research.
The team has developed "physical-like instruments" for both real-time and offline measurements of the happiness in large-scale texts -- "basically, huge bags of words", Danforth said.
They called this instrument a "hedonometer" - a happiness meter.
It can now trace the global happiness signal from English-language Twitter posts on a near-real-time basis, and show differing happiness signals between days.
The study appeared in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
