Terming political corruption as the fountainhead of all corruption in the country, CIC Information Commissioner M.S. Acharyulu on Friday said demonetisation will not succeed unless political parties became transparent.
Speaking at the Transparency International India's National Conference here on 'Combating Corruption', the Central Information Commission's officer questioned the Representation of the People Act, 1951, which requires political parties to declare details of only contributions received in excess of Rs 20,000.
"You have a law in this country which says political parties need not disclose donations below Rs 20,000. If a law, instead of facilitating transparency, authorises non-transparency, then how can you expect to reduce the influence of money in elections," he asked.
"Political corruption is the fountainhead of all corruption in the country.
"I am not against tax exemption to political parties but let me know the extent of exemption you enjoy. Why don't the political parties disclose donations below Rs 20,000.
"Non-disclosure of political donations below Rs 20,000 will fail any system, including demonetisation," said the noted legal expert.
Blaming the political parties for "failing the system", Acharyulu said state funding of elections will be counter-productive unless political parties became transparent.
"Today we are talking about state funding of elections. But without transparency in political parties, such a move will be sheer wastage of public money. You can introduce state funding only subject to the condition that each and every political party will be transparent," he added.
While hailing Prime Minister Narendra Modi's decision to ask all BJP MPs and MLAs to submit their bank transaction-details since the November 8 announcement of demonetisation, Acharyulu questioned why the same was not asked to be done by all Members of Parliament.
"It is a very welcome move but why not all the MPs? Why just bank transactions and why not their income tax returns," he asked.
He also lamented lack of action against elected representatives for perjury and misrepresentation of facts.
"The question is are we really punishing people for dishonesty? Except for sporadic instances, are we punishing people for perjury, for dishonesty? Is there a real check on the facts claimed by the elected members in their election affidavits," wondered Acharyulu.
--IANS
and/sm/dg
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
