The government was on Wednesday urged to lay down a 'cooling off period' for retired civil servants and senior officials to prevent them from seeking immediate re-employment in the private sector.
This will prevent civic officials from immediately joining a private firm post-retirement thereby preventing misuse of the office when they are in service, members in the Lok Sabha averred.
The issue was raised by S.P. Muddahanume Gowda of Congress and Kalyan Banerjee from Trinamool Congress (TMC) during Question Hour. Banerjee and Gowda directed their queries in this regard at Minister of State (MoS) for Personnel Jitendra Singh.
Banerjee said the existing mechanism was flawed. "Experience speaks that after retirement, not only the bureaucrats but even judicial officers go to the tribunals. Who are these bureaucrats? They are bureaucrats at the point of time in the government, they are the favoured bureaucrats. This is not functioning," he said.
Congress member Godwa said: "Sometimes, we have seen that the officials take decisions causing burden to the exchequer of the country to help private companies and immediately after retirement, they are re-employed by such private companies."
MoS (PMO) Jitendra Singh in reply said the concern raised by members was "well taken" by the government.
Singh said:"This is already a matter of concern. The government is already considering it. In fact, there already exists a 'cooling off period'. In case an officer wants to get employed or get engaged in the private sector, he not only has to complete one year post-superannuation, he is also expected to seek permission from the government."
He asserted that in such cases it is "the prerogative of the government to give permission or not".
Singh further admitted that "it is an issue of debate" both inside Parliament and outside on what ideally should be the parameters to be followed for giving post-retirement appointments to the bureaucrats.
He said it is true that often "extraneous considerations and political considerations", as mentioned by the members, do creep in.
"I think, this is something which requires a larger consensus and all of us can help reach it," he said adding that the government has already taken up the matter.
"We are always moving in the direction of constant evolution and constant improvement to make the working and the system and the mechanism of appointments more impartial and less affected by nepotism and favouritism," Singh said.
--IANS
nd/in/dg
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
