SC anguished over UP identifying riot victims by religion

Image
IANS New Delhi
Last Updated : Oct 17 2013 | 9:31 PM IST

The Supreme Court Thursday said it was "deeply pained" as the Uttar Pradesh government, in two reports, gave the details of the affected people in the recent communal violence in Muzaffarnagar and other places on the basis of their religion.

"Death is a death" and the "segregation" of the riot-affected people by their religious identities has "deeply pained us", said a bench of Chief Justice P. Sathasivam, Justice Ranjana Prakash Desai and Justice Ranjan Gogoi in the course of the hearing.

"We are not happy with your report," observed Chief Justice Sathasivam as senior counsel Rajiv Dhawan told the court about steps taken by the state government for rehabilitation of the riot-affected people and follow-up police action to make people account for their acts leading to communal flare-up.

Giving the details of the steps it had taken, the state government sought to dust itself of anything in which politics or electoral considerations could be read.

It contended that there was no "bias" in handling the situation including extending relief and rehabilitation and proceedings against the people for their acts of alleged violence and instigation of mobs.

The issue under examination, Dhawan told the court was whether there was a "communal bias in the handling of the situation".

As advocate M.L. Sharma sought to project that Jats were being discriminated in relief and rehabilitation measures, Dhawan said that "if there are cases of discrimination, then he should specifically point out so that it could be addressed".

At this, Chief Justice Sathasivam intervened. "We can't take it lightly. You will respond to Sharma's application," he said.

As counsel Prashant Bhushan sought to press for a Central Bureau of Investigation probe into the revelation in a sting operation that police officials were not given a free hand in dealing with the situation, Dhawan urged the court to allow the state government to place before it all the details and then the court could look into the plea for an independent probe.

Allowing the plea by Dhawan for more time, the court adjourned the hearing and directed the listing of the matter on Nov 21, asking the Uttar Pradesh government to file its report by Nov 18 and make the copies of it available to all the parties.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Oct 17 2013 | 9:26 PM IST

Next Story