The Supreme Court Friday declined to stay, for now, a Delhi High Court order directing nursery admissions according to the guidelines issued by the Lt. Governor, giving no immediate relief to private unaided schools.
An apex court bench headed by Justice H.L. Dattu and S.A.Bobde directed the listing of the matter next Friday (Jan 31) when the plea by the private unaided schools was mentioned before it.
Justice Dattu observed that Lt. Governor Najeeb Jung was an eminent educationist and he must have taken all the aspects into account before framing the guidelines. The plea on behalf of unaided private schools has been moved by Forum for Promotion of Quality Education for All and others.
Jung had in December 2013 issued guidelines that provided for various steps including abolition of 20 percent management quota and weightage for neighbourhood children to nursery section admissions.
The unaided private schools have challenged the Jan 20 Delhi High Court order directing the Delhi government to notify the guidelines issued by the Lt. Governor and also the date of admissions.
The plea by the unaided private schools has challenged the dismissal of their plea challenging to the notification fixing the admission criteria for nursery.
The Delhi High Court by its Jan 20 order had refused to stay the notification on the criteria for nursery admissions in the city, holding that any "interference at this stage would create confusion".
The bench, in its order, said that the stay of the notification at this stage would be "detrimental to the interest of children as well as parents".
"We are of the view that appellants (schools) have not been able to satisfy us of any irreparable loss and injury to them from the non-grant of the interim order sought," it said.
The court added: "We are in agreement with the single judge that any interference at this stage would create confusion and would be detrimental to the interest of children as well as parents of the wards who are seeking admission."
The nursery admission process, which was to start from Jan 15, was on hold after the government told the bench it "would wait for the court's decision on the issue before commencing the admission process".
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
