AThe Supreme Court on Wednesday dismissed a PIL seeking direction to stop alleged funding of separatist organisations in Jammu and Kashmir by the central and the state governments, saying that the courts should refrain from entering the area.
Holding that this PIL does not deserve to be entertained, the bench of Justice Dipak Misra and Justice Uday Umesh Lalit said: "We are of the considered opinion that the grant of funds to State of Jammu and Kashmir for the purposes of security or otherwise is within the exclusive domain of the Central Government.
Pointing out that the issue raised in the PIL, moved by advocate M.L. Sharma by was not a "judicially manageable proceeding", Justice Misra said that "in issues like this the courts have minimum role".
"In a matter like this, we are of the considered opinion that a public interest litigation does not deserve to be entertained and, therefore, we are not inclined to interfere. That apart, needless to emphasise, it is not a judicially manageable proceeding and the Court should refrain from entering into the said area," the bench said in its order.
Justice Misra said: "These are nationally sensitive issues, for they belong to arena of national security. What is best for the national security is to be left to the government."
As PIL petitioner advocate Sharma named Hurriyat leader Syed Ali Geelani being one of the beneficiaries of state security and other facilities, Justice Lalit said: "If there is a threat perception to a citizen, it is for the government to decide, may be the conduct of that person may not be to the liking of other citizens."
Justice Misra said that it was misconception that judiciary was the protector of the country, for judiciary only decides whether an act of the state or a law was legal or illegal, and it was for the central government and army to protect the country.
Sharma told the court that it was the J&K government which has said that it has spent more than Rs 300 crore on the separatist organisations and their leaders. He told the court that the bill for the stay of these leaders in luxury hotels alone was Rs 21 crore.
Referring to a statement by the Union Home Ministry saying that these facilities should be withdrawn, he said that hundreds of security personnel were guarding the separatist leaders while they were instigating the youth in Kashmir against India.
The PIL petition had sought the prosecution of concerned authorities under the Prevention of Corruption Act as funds sanctioned to the J&K on various heads was in breach of constitutional provisions.
He had also sought direction prohibiting the central government from giving any kind of funds to the State of Jammu and Kashmir.
--IANS
pk/vd
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
