SC junks plea for restoration of clogged rivers

Image
IANS New Delhi
Last Updated : Jun 21 2018 | 8:30 PM IST

The Supreme Court on Thursday declined to entertain a plea seeking restoration of the rivers flowing through reserve forests in Uttar Pradesh with their beds overloaded with sand, bajri (gravel), morang and boulder as it questioned the bonafides of the petitioner.

Petitioner Gopal Chandra Sinha is the Assistant Conservator of Forest in the State Forest Department. He had joined the Uttar Pradesh Forest Corp (UPFC) as Divisional Manager. An FIR was lodged against Sinha and another official on May 5 and at present he is under suspension.

Sinha had sought directions for immediate start of the work for the restoration of rivers clogged with forest produce and the sub-minerals -- sand, bajri, morang and boulder.

The PIL also urged the court to appoint an advocate commissioner to monitor the work.

Observing that there was merit in the issue raised in the PIL, a vacation bench of Justice S. Abdul Nazeer and Justice Indu Malhotra said but "we have serious doubts about the petitioner" who is a subordinate officer in the UPFC and has issues with his senior.

Telling the senior counsel Anoop Chaudhari that the issue could be moved by some other person or NGO, the court said there was a criminal complaint against the petitioner by the state government.

"We have serious doubts... you have mentioned about the FIR (in the PIL). We do feel there is merit in the issue. You have reasons to settle scores with the seniors," said the bench declining the plea.

The court was unmoved as senior counsel Chaudhari told the bench to ignore the petitioner and take suo motu cognizance of the issue raised the PIL

Technical bids were finalized on May 3, 2018 and the very next day the Managing Director of the UPFC cancelled them and the FIR was lodged against Sinha and another official on May 5.

Sinha has been accused of cheating (Section 420 of the IPC), conspiracy (Section 120B IPC), criminal breach of trust (Section 408 IPC), mischief involving wrongful loss or damage to the public (Section 425 IPC), and under the provisions of the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980.

The restoration of riverbeds overloaded with sand, bajri, morang and boulder in the 12 forest divisions of Uttar Pradesh was required for the restoration, reclamation and conservation of forests and forest land.

The restoration of rivers passing through forests involved the extraction of the sub-minerals deposited on the riverbeds of the rivers, primarily river Ganga, which the UPFC was to undertake.

The PIL was dismissed as withdrawn.

--IANS

pk/him/vm

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jun 21 2018 | 8:22 PM IST

Next Story