SC notice over alleged PwC irregularities

Image
IANS New Delhi
Last Updated : Dec 06 2013 | 8:12 PM IST

The Supreme Court Friday issued notice to the government on a public suit seeking a probe into the allegations of irregularities in India by US-based economic consultancy PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC).

Issuing the notice also to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), the Enforcement Directorate and Central Board of Direct Taxes among others, a bench of Chief Justice P. Sathasivam, Justice Ranjana Prakash Desai and Justice Ranjan Gogoi said the issues raised by NGO Centre for Public Interest Litigation (CPIL) need to be examined.

The notice, returnable in four weeks, has also been issued to Registrar of Companies, Kolkata, The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, PricewaterhouseCoopers Private Limited and its four partnership companies operating in India.

The CPIL has sought "an immediate enquiry" into various allegations against PricewaterhouseCoopers and its various network audit firms operating in India and sharing the PwC name for alleged falsification of books of accounts, evasion of income-tax and violation of FDI rules, RBI guidelines and the Foreign Exchange Management Act, among others.

"Apparent violations of various regulations, policies and statutes, prima facie, makes a fit case for thorough investigation and any inaction of the relevant authorities to investigate could result in jeopardising and undermining of public interest, rule of the law and the regulatory structure besides probable loss to the public exchequer," it said.

Citing instances of apparent financial irregularities and violations of the regulations by PwC India, the PIL claimed that there was an inflow of Rs. 240 crores "apparently from overseas" to the various entities of PwC India in the financial years 2010 and 2011.

"This was in violation of the FDI policies, RBI guidelines and other rules and regulation... which was not reflected correctly in their account books," the PIL said.

CPIL counsel Prashant Bhushan said that there were unexplained credits that were made to audit firms which in turn were used to acquire Mumbai based audit firm Dalal and Shah through a "circuitous route by giving interest free loans of the exact amount to its four partners and further allowing them to invest the said exact amount in Dalal& Shah, Mumbai".

This, Bhushan argued, was in "violation of the FDI policy, RBI guidelines, FEMA and regulations thereunder and ICAI regulations and also resulting in evasion of income-tax".

The PIL said that only three firms of PwC paid insurance premium but the benefits of the insurance policy were enjoyed even by other member firms which did not pay any premium in violation of the Companies Act.

The violations of rules and regulations, the PIL said "are in public domain for more than one year. However, the relevant authorities have failed to do any investigation into these allegations/reports and take required action against them which poses serious risk and threat to the public interest".

The inaction of the relevant authorities, the PIL said has also resulted in undermining of the law and the regulatory structure.

The PIL wondered whether the reluctance of the regulators to investigate or take any action against PwC India was due to "the international clout & influence and financial strength of PwC which is one of the world's leading auditing and advisory firms".

Pointing to the way Indian regulators were shying away from proceedings against the wrongdoings of the Indian arm of the US consultancy firm, the PIL said that "one of its network audit firms, M/s Price Waterhouse Bangalore, who were the auditors of the erstwhile Satyam Computer Services Limited (Satyam) for more than eight years, failed to discover the biggest accounting scandal till date in Indian history".

The scandal came to light only after its disgraced founder-chairman B.Ramalinga Raju confessed to it in January 2009, it said.

The PIL said that although the trial in the Satyam matter was still on in India, the US regulators, - Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) - by their April 5, 2011, order had imposed civil money penalty aggregating $7.5 million and other sanctions on five partnership firms of PwC based in Kolkata, Bangalore and Mumbai.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Dec 06 2013 | 8:08 PM IST

Next Story