SC refuses to interfere in appointment of acting J&K DGP

Image
IANS New Delhi
Last Updated : Sep 20 2018 | 7:45 PM IST

The Supreme Court on Thursday refused to interfere in the appointment of senior IPS officer Dilbagh Singh as the acting DGP of Jammu and Kashmir but asked the UPSC to expedite finalisation of the panel of names for making a regular appointment to the post.

A bench of Chief Justice Dipak Misra, Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Justice D.Y. Chandrachud gave the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) five weeks to finalise the panel of names after it was told that a request in this regard was forwarded to the commission soon after earlier DGP S.P. Vaid was removed.

The court was told that the UPSC had sought some more details, which would be made available in a couple of days, the state's lawyer Shoeb Alam said.

On the other hand, Prashant Bhushan, appearing for former Uttar Pradesh DGP Prakash Singh, told the court that Dilbag Singh's appointment as the acting DGP was contrary to the top court's 2006 judgment and its later orders. Even if an acting DGP was to be appointed it should have been the senior most officer in state police hierarchy, he contended.

Attorney General K.K. Venugopal told the court that former DGP Vaid and four others have no problem over Dilbag Singh's appointment.

Bhushan told the court that he had already moved a contempt petition over alleged violation of the top court's order in the appointment of the acting DGP.

Bhushan, during hearing of the matter on September 11, had questioned the appointment on the grounds that the officer had been charge-sheeted in a recruitment scam.

The senior counsel had told the court that Vaid was removed even though there were no charges against him and without consulting the State Security Commission.

The 2006 apex court directions on police reforms came on a petition by former Uttar Pradesh DGP Prakash Singh, wherein it was ordered that there cannot be an acting DGP for any state.

The court also made it mandatory for states to send a list of three senior most IPS officers to the UPSC for clearance before appointing the DGP.

On July 3, 2018, the Supreme Court passed another order to lay down further guidelines for the DGP's appointment, stressing that there is no concept of an 'acting DGP'.

--IANS

pk/tsb/sed

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Sep 20 2018 | 7:38 PM IST

Next Story