SC reserves order on challenge to EC move for NOTA in RS polls

Image
IANS New Delhi
Last Updated : Jul 30 2018 | 8:50 PM IST

The Supreme Court on Monday reserved its order on a plea challenging the Election Commission's circulars making NOTA applicable to Rajya Sabha election as the court appeared unimpressed by the poll panel's position on the issue.

The bench of Chief Justice Dipak Misra, Justice A.M.Khanwilkar and Justice D.Y.Chandrachid reserved the order, observing that Rajya Sabha elections are complicated as it is and why does the Election Commission wants to make it more complicated.

Attorney General K.K.Venugopal told the court that NOTA could not be made applicable to election to Rajya Sabha as it was different from general elections where the voter was generally not politically affiliated, adding that a voter in Rajya Sabha election is politically affiliated and bound by the party constitution and could face action for defying it.

Disagreeing with the Election Commission on introducing NOTA in Rajya Sabha elections, he sought to show the distinction between the electoral college of elected members of legislature in the State assembly with that ofA common voters in a general election.

Chief Justice Misra differed with the advocate appearing for the Election Commission who sought to invoke the Constitution's Article 19 (1)(a) guaranteeing freedom of speech and expression to support introduction of NOTA in the election to upper house.

Ruling out linking voting for election to Rajya Sabha and Article 19(1)(a), he asked how can a constitutional court be a party to something not constitutional.

"Whatever he (voter in election to Rajya Sabha) does, we can't interfere in parliamentary matters. Let him not vote," said Chief Justice Misra.

Justice Chandrachud asked the lawyer for the EC that if NOTA was allowed the value of vote will become zero asking why a voter in Rajya Sabha elections shows the party representative that he has voted for a candidate fielded by the party.

Petitioner Shailesh Manubhai Parmar had challenged the vires of the January 24, 2014 and November 12, 2015, Election Commission circulars making NOTA applicable to election to Rajya Sabha.

Senior counsel Abhishek Manu Singhvi, appearing for Parmar, thrashed the EC move on different counts including proportional representation, open ballot, preferences and transfer of surplus votes to candidates of other parties.

--IANS

pk/vd

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jul 30 2018 | 8:42 PM IST

Next Story