SC sets aside Madras HC order granting 196 marks to candidates

Image
IANS New Delhi
Last Updated : Nov 22 2018 | 9:35 PM IST

The Supreme Court on Thursday set aside the Madras High Court judgement granting 196 marks to each of the 24,000 candidates who took NEET-UG exam in Tamil language as some of the questions were wrongly translated.

Setting aside the judgement by which the court gave four marks each for 49 questions, the bench of Justice S.A. Bonbde and Justice L. Nageswara Rao said the "method adopted by the High Court is manifestly arbitrary and unjustified and cannot be sustained."

The court directed that from "the year 2019-20 onwards, the NEET-UG Examination would be conducted by the National Testing Agency and the bilingual exam will be conducted after the question paper is translated" as per the instruction mentioned in the October 22 affidavit filed by the Director, NTA.

The court noted that out of 13,23,672 lakh students, who appeared for the exam, approximately 10.5 lakh took it in English, around 1.5 lakh chose a regional languages and of these, nearly 24,000 took the exam in Tamil language.

The court said the list of the candidates who appeared for NEET-UG in Tamil after adding 196 marks to each one of them is "startling".

"For instance, a student who got 260 marks has been awarded a total of 456 marks. Even students who got 21 marks are entitled to 217 marks", the court noted.

"It is clear the High Court lost sight of the primary duty in such matter that is to avoid arbitrary results", the judgment pronounced by Justice Bobde said.

"The High Court has made no attempt to see whether the students have in fact attempted answers to the questions, which were claimed to be imperfectly translated."

The top court order came on a plea by Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE) challenging the Madurai bench of the Madras High Court judgement on July 10 awarding the additional marks.

The High Court's order was in response to a PIL by Communist Party of India-Marxist leader T.K. Rangarajan.

The top court had stayed the operation of the High Court order on July 20.

--IANS

pk/prs

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Nov 22 2018 | 9:28 PM IST

Next Story