SC to examine whether third party can file appeal in a criminal case

Image
IANS New Delhi
Last Updated : Jan 16 2018 | 9:16 PM IST

With CBI not challenging the discharge of Britain-based Hinduja brothers - Srichand, Gopichand and Prakash Hinduja - in the alleged kickbacks in the purchase of Bofors 155 mm howitzers guns, the Supreme Court will examine whether third party can file an appeal.

Posting the matter for hearing on February 2, the bench of Chief Justice Dipak Misra, Justice A. M. Khanwilkar and Justice D.Y.Chandrachud asked the petitioner, practising advocate Ajay Agrawal, to address the court on this aspect and argue within the parameters permitting him to be heard.

Embarking to examine whether third party has a locus in appealing against an order in criminal case, Chief Justice Misra said that the top court was facing problem as it has developed a different kind of criminal jurisprudence.

"You can't invoke Article 136 (on the Constitution, giving the apex court special leave to allow an appeal against any judgment, sentence, and order of any lower Indian court or tribunal) that way. That a third party can be granted permission to file a plea in a criminal case."

"PIL is used in personal battles, political battles, commercial battles, publicity battles and now in criminal jurisprudence," the court wondered as it dwelt on the scope of PILs it has expanded.

Its response came as Agrawal argued that the matter was of public importance as lots of soldiers lost their lives because a faulty selection of gun and a lesson will have to be taught to those who entered into the deal.

The court order came as Additional Solicitor General Maninder Singh told the court that there was no appeal by the Central Bureau of Investigation against the Delhi High Court's 2005 order discharging Hinduja brothers as it was advised so, though adding the judgment ought to have been challenged.

"High Court should not have passed the discharge order in a review plea. It is contrary to Supreme Court order," he said.

At this, the court observed: "If prosecution (CBI) does not challenge or remain silent, (then) why should we get into it."

The Rajiv Gandhi government (1984-89) was rocked over the allegations of kickbacks in the purchase of 155 mm Howitzers guns from the Swedish arms manufacturer.

--IANS

pk/vd

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jan 16 2018 | 9:10 PM IST

Next Story