Smartphones can function as early warning systems for large earthquakes, says a study.
The study found that the Global Positioning System receivers in a smartphone can detect the permanent ground movement (displacement) caused by fault motion in a large earthquake.
Using crowd-sourced observations from participating users' smartphones, earthquakes could be detected, analysed, and customised earthquake warnings could be transmitted back to users, the researchers observed.
"Crowd-sourced alerting means that the community will benefit by data generated from the community," said lead author Sarah Minson from U.S. Geological Survey (USGS).
Earthquake early warning systems detect the start of an earthquake and rapidly transmit warnings to people and automated systems before they experience shaking at their location.
Researchers tested the feasibility of crowd-sourced EEW with a simulation of a hypothetical magnitude seven earthquake, and with real data from the 2011 magnitude nine Tohoku-oki, Japan earthquake.
The results showed that crowd-sourced EEW could be achieved with only a tiny percentage of people in a given area contributing information from their smartphones.
For example, if phones from fewer than 5000 people in a large metropolitan area responded, the earthquake could be detected and analysed fast enough to issue a warning to areas farther away before the onset of strong shaking.
However, smartphone sensors could sense earthquakes of magnitude seven or larger, but not smaller yet potentially damaging quakes.
"Crowd-sourced data are less precise, but for larger earthquakes that cause large shifts in the ground surface, they contain enough information to detect that an earthquake has occurred, information necessary for early warning," said study co-author Susan Owen from NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California.
This technology could serve regions of the world that cannot afford conventional earthquake early warning systems, which are very expensive.
"Most of the world does not receive earthquake warnings mainly due to the cost of building the necessary scientific monitoring networks," said project lead Benjamin Brooks, also from USGS.
The study was published in the new AAAS journal Science Advances.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
