A main Syrian opposition group at home has hailed the Russian initiative put forward to avert a possible military action by the US against Syria.
Safwan Akkashe, a member of the oppositional National Coordination Body (NCB), told Xinhua in an interview that the Russian initiative aimed at stripping Washington of its pretexts to unleash a military strike against Syria.
On Monday, Russia proposed a fresh initiative on the Syrian crisis, calling for putting the chemical stockpiles of the Damascus government under international control, a move that was designed to spare Syria a possible US military strike over alleged use of poisonous gas by the Syrian government in populated areas Aug 21.
Syrian Foreign Minister Walid al-Moallem welcomed the Russian proposal.
"From our perspective, we must do the impossible to avoid a possible military aggression on Syria," Akkashe said, adding that averting the war is very important.
"Historic experience taught us that once aggression starts, the country would enter into a war that could lead to its destruction," he noted.
He said that "we don't want any foreign aggression against our country", adding that he thought the situation now was going towards pacification.
He said his group had initially proposed the initiative during a recent meeting with Russian officials.
According to Akkashe, after the implementation of such an initiative, all parties concerned must take part in the Geneva conference that was initially designed to bridge the gap between the Syrian government and the opposition.
"All parties must go seriously to the planned conference in Geneva to agree on the halt of violence and on a transitional government in order for us to reach democracy," he said.
On May 7, both Moscow and Washington said they had decided to hold an international conference in Geneva designed to facilitate a solution to the Syrian crisis through a political dialogue.
The planned, yet delayed, conference is a follow-up to last year's international meeting in Geneva that drafted a peace road-map for Syria that could never be implemented.
While the Damascus-based opposition accepted the Russian plan, the Western-backed exiled opposition dismissed it as it was hoping for a foreign military assault on Syria to hasten the downfall of the Syrian administration.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
