A final deal between Iran and the P5+1 group of countries on Iran's nuclear programme should be endorsed under the Chapter VII of the United Nations Charter, a source close to the talks between the two sides has said.
According to the source on Wednesday, if Iran and its opposite sides in the negotiations want to strike a binding comprehensive accord, they should try to obtain the required approval from the UN, so that the terms of the agreement could not be violated in the future, Press TV reported.
The unidentified source said putting the deal under a UN oversight and have it approved by a UN Security Council resolution is the "main request of the Iran from its negotiating sides."
He added that such a move by the Security Council would also guarantee the removal of the unfair sanctions, which were imposed on Iran under the terms of Chapter VII of the UN Charter.
"A resolution (by the Security Council) under Chapter VII will naturally be a part of the comprehensive solution," he said, adding that if the final deal is not adopted as a UNSC resolution,
"it would be useless and would fail to change the system set up by previous Chapter VII resolutions."
The official denied that Iran's insistence on the issue had anything to do with a recent letter by some Republican senators, who tried to sabotage a potential deal on Tehran's nuclear activities.
In an unexpected move on March 9, 2015, 47 Republican senators issued a desperate warning to the Iranian officials on the validity of a potential nuclear deal, describing such an agreement as "nothing more than an executive agreement" which could be cancelled by the next US president "at a stroke of a pen."
Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif recently elaborated on Iran's intention to subject a potential deal with the P5+1 states to a UN endorsement, so that future governments of the parties to the deal could not change it.
A "resolution under Chapter VII of the UN charter is an international and binding treaty for all the member states," Zarif said in an interview with Persian-language Seda magazine.
Zarif said once the countries strike a deal, that deal should be approved and confirmed by the UN Security Council, adding that in such a situation, "any deal is binding for the current US government and for the future US governments."
Officials in the US, one of the major parties to the talks with Iran, have declared that they have no intention of using the UN to cement the Iran deal.
Jen Psaki, a spokesperson for the US State Department, said Thursday that Washington seeks a nonbinding deal in order to keep Congress out of the debate in the near term.
Iran and the P5+1 countries -- the US, Britain, France, China, Russia plus Germany -- are seeking to seal a comprehensive nuclear deal by July 1.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
