Several women including lawyers, activists and members of NGOs on Tuesday protested outside the Supreme Court after an in-house panel of the court cleared Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi of sexual harassment charges.
The women were detained by the police and taken to the Mandir Marg Police station.
Soon after, prohibitory orders banning the assembly of four or more people were imposed outside the Supreme Court in the heart of Delhi.
The women held placards as they protested against the clean chit given to the Chief Justice by the in-house committee of his colleagues.
"Do Constitutional rights to protest not apply to the Supreme Court?" tweeted noted lawyer Prashant Bhushan.
CPI-M leader Brinda Karat said: "The procedure seems to be totally unjust. Why can't the victim be given the report? It's wrong. When they are dismissing the matter, more questions are being raised about the procedures adopted by the Supreme Court. It's injustice."
Lawyer Amritananda Chakravorty added: "We were not allowed to protest even for five minutes. First the Supreme Court allows a farce process and then can't accept any criticism. The rule of law has died a thousand deaths."
The protest comes after a three-judge top court panel headed by Justice S.A. Bobde found no substance on Monday in the sexual harassment allegations levelled by a former apex court employee against Chief Justice Gogoi.
The complainant on April 30 accused the CJI of sexually harassing her and said that she would no longer appear before the in-house panel as she felt that she was "not likely to get justice".
The former employee of the Supreme Court said she felt "quite intimidated and nervous" in the presence of the three Supreme Court judges.
She had said that she was not even given the opportunity to go through her recorded statement.
On Tuesday, the woman asked the in-house probe committee for a copy of the report giving a clean chit to the CJI.
"I have a right to know how, why and on what basis have your Lordships found my complaint to have 'no substance'," she said, adding she was "deeply shocked" on the outcome of the committee's findings.
"Despite my detailed affidavit, ample corroborative evidence and clear, consistent statement reiterating my experience of sexual harassment and consequent victimization, the Committee has found no substance in my complaint and affidavit," she said.
--IANS
ss-sp/mr/soni
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
