A gaping hole

Europe challenged by inadequate private investment

Image
Olaf Storbeck
Last Updated : Jul 05 2014 | 12:07 AM IST
Worries about government underinvestment in the euro zone may be misplaced. While many of the member states should probably put more money into infrastructure, a new study by Berlin-based economic think tank DIW shows that a protracted dearth in private sector investment threatens the continent's long-term economic potential.

Europe's capital stock, the underpinning of its wealth, is already ageing at a worrying pace. In several European countries - in particular Germany, the Netherlands and Finland - the weakness long predates the financial crisis. Since 1999, the ratio of annual investment expenditure to GDP was 0.5 percentage points lower than the level necessary to keep the capital stock in good nick and to foster future growth, the DIW calculates.

The euro crisis has made things worse. In hard-hit countries like Greece, Ireland, Portugal and Spain the level of private investment has dropped by as much as 40 per cent, with few signs of a substantial recovery. For the entire euro zone, the annual shortfall is euro 180 billion, or two per cent of GDP.

Curing the problem is more difficult than diagnosing it. After all, each private company makes its own investment decisions. If so many of them have been cautious for so long, there must be something structurally unattractive about the euro zone's investment environment.

Governments could help with generous tax breaks for capital expenditure. A temporary, pan-European investment fund funnelling cheap credit to companies would be an even more important initiative. DIW reports that sheer access to credit, not the cost of borrowing, is often the biggest obstacle, in particular for small and medium-sized enterprises.

The problem requires some big thinking from European policymakers - and some big spending. A euro 90 billion investment fund, half of the annual shortfall, looks like a minimum to have any noticeable effect.

Of course, such measures would weigh on governments' budgets. Germanic austerity hawks might be unhappy at the prospect, but the DIW study also has a hard lesson for fans of government spending. Kick-starting private sector spending will do more for the economy than old-school expansionary fiscal policy.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jul 04 2014 | 10:21 PM IST

Next Story