Dunce cap

Breaking debt cap is best of bad options for Obama

Image
Reynolds Holding
Last Updated : Feb 05 2013 | 9:04 PM IST

Blowing through the debt ceiling may be the best of (US) President Barack Obama’s bad options. He has to meet US obligations, and he can’t cut spending or raise taxes without Congress’s say-so. The only choice is to borrow more — but some lawmakers want to stop him from doing that. Legally, his safest bet is to ignore them.

A faux solution making the rounds is for the treasury department to mint a $1-trillion coin, technically putting the government below the debt limit. But the authorising law probably applies only to commemorative coins, and besides, the proposal just sounds silly. Another suggestion would see the government issuing IOUs, as California did during its 2009 Budget crisis. That’s creative but at best a temporary fix.

One promising approach has already been rejected by Obama. A clause in the US Constitution’s Fourteenth Amendment essentially says the feds cannot renege on debts, meaning the borrowing limit could, if it came down to a court decision, be declared unconstitutional. A possible sticking point, however, is that the clause doesn’t actually say the president can issue more debt without congressional authorisation.

And in law, he probably can’t. Only Congress is invested with the power to tax, borrow or spend. If lawmakers don’t raise the debt cap, Obama is out of luck. Of course, so are the critics who think he can just spend less than instructed by Congress. That, too, would violate the Constitution.

Boxed in legally, the president could decide to do whatever he deemed in the public interest: Reduce spending, increase borrowing, even raise taxes or sell public lands. But the options aren’t necessarily equal in the law’s eyes. Spending cuts, for instance, would require Obama to mess with the policy judgments Congress made. Choosing whom to pay would be a major intrusion on the Hill’s power.

Issuing more debt would avoid getting into Congress’s business in this way. As a result, it’s arguably the least illegal of the various alternatives. Investors might wonder whether the extra debt was fully backed by the government and that could trigger volatility, but it would beat a federal default. Best of all, it could force deficit hawks in Congress to stop relying on gimmicks like the debt ceiling and start making tough choices about spending.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jan 14 2013 | 12:52 AM IST

Next Story