It is correct that India is not witnessing a decline in economic activity at a scale like last year but there are two points worth highlighting here. First, the current decline in economic activity is on an extremely weak base. A significant delay in full recovery will have wider economic implications, including for households. Second, a higher caseload and deaths beyond a point might begin to hurt economic activity more significantly. As things stand today, while some of the high-frequency indicators are showing a big year-on-year increase, it is reasonable to assume that output in the current quarter would be lower than in the last two quarters sequentially. This would have also reversed the recovery in individual incomes.
While it would take years to gauge different dimensions of the cost imposed by the pandemic once it’s over, a new report by Azim Premji University gives early insights into how the first wave affected income and employment, among other things. About 100 million people lost jobs in the April-May 2020 lockdown. While most were back and found jobs, about 15 million people remained jobless even by the end of 2020. Besides, it’s worth noting that though most workers were back at work, informality went up sharply. About half of salaried workers took informal work. As a result, monthly income on average fell by 17 per cent. Loss of employment and income affected women disproportionately. The study further notes that the number of individuals earning below the national minimum wage threshold went up by 230 million. This has led to a significant increase in poverty. Unsurprisingly, households responded by cutting food intake, selling assets, and borrowing from different sources.
It is likely that the condition would have worsened again with the rise in Covid cases and decline in economic activity. In this context, the government has done well by restarting the free food grain distribution programme. It would help reduce the pain to some extent. But a significant loss of income for a large number of households and an increase in poverty levels will add to policy challenges. In fact, it could end up undermining the economic recovery. To be sure, the state of the labour market and most vulnerable households will require both a short- and medium-term policy response. The focus, however, at the moment needs to be on containing the pandemic. India lost two major advantages in its battle against the coronavirus — early decline in infections and having a large vaccine-manufacturing base. Further policy oversights will only increase the pain in terms of lives and livelihoods lost — something that the headline numbers may not be able to adequately capture.
One subscription. Two world-class reads.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)