Evergrande crisis: A modified script may need to be written on China

This crisis could mark the end of the long run of "miracle" growth that made China the world's second-largest economy, and a challenger to the US in economic and strategic clout, writes T N Ninan

Image
T N Ninan
4 min read Last Updated : Sep 24 2021 | 11:06 PM IST
China makes the biggest single-country contribution to global economic growth. As the world’s manufacturing hub, and its leading trading nation, it is the primary contributor to changes in global demand and to trade in virtually every commodity. This year, China is expected to contribute more than a third of global growth. It follows from all this that if China slows down, the world will slow down. And if Chinese demand falls, prices will fall for everything from oil to steel. The repercussions will be felt in all markets, including in the world of finance.
 
So the crisis in China’s biggest housing company, Evergrande, owned by the man who used to be China’s wealthiest individual, has made markets nervous everywhere. Evergrande’s business is humongous: It has some 1.6 million houses under construction, and it has debt of $300 billion (close to the total of India’s large corporate sector). It owns two-thirds of an electric vehicle company that, before it had turned out even one vehicle, was valued higher than Ford Motors. When a company of that size teeters on the edge of financial default, markets hold their breath – as they have done this past week.
 
Evergrande’s share price has already fallen to one-sixth of its level a year ago. Its bond prices fell to 26 cents to the dollar – ie, investors hoped to get back a quarter of the money they put in – before recovering partially on Friday. Evergrande has failed to pay staff salaries, and bills of vendors. Some local governments have forbidden the sale of fresh apartments. If the company does keel over, it will have ripple effects on other housing companies in China, and raise the risk premium for emerging market bonds. If credit flow dries up, even otherwise viable companies in China might suddenly find that they cannot continue operations.
 
And yet, when set against the scale at which the Chinese economy operates, this looks like a small problem that can be fixed without too much difficulty. Evergrande’s $300-billion debt amounts to a fraction of 1 per cent of total Chinese debt. The Chinese authorities can restructure the company, unrelated businesses (like the electric vehicle company) can be sold, and so on. Evidence of state backing can calm markets and limit the toxic fall-out.
 
But there’s the rub. Evergrande is in trouble because it is a part of a much larger problem that forced Beijing last year to crack down on excessive debt, especially but not only in housing companies. As is well known, China’s debt is dangerously high at close to three times its GDP, with the ratio having nearly doubled in recent years. The tighter credit norms announced last year meant that companies like Evergrande faced new limits on further borrowing. Beijing then signalled that it was serious by allowing a few companies to go under. If it now bails out Evergrande, other companies will expect similar treatment – and that would defeat the purpose of the financial squeeze. The course of events will be decided by Beijing’s perception of financial contagion and systemic risk. In short, while Evergrande may account for less than 1 per cent of total Chinese debt, is it too big to be allowed to fail?
 
The international financial implications of Evergrande going under may be limited since most of its debt is domestic. Still, there will be second-round effects. More importantly, if it is the free flow of credit that has helped to sustain China’s rapid growth, especially after the international financial crisis of 2008, tighter credit norms must affect the pace of Chinese economic activity and therefore of the larger global economy. Even if Evergrande survives, it will take years to repair balance sheets – as India has painfully discovered. Either way, this could mark the end of the long run of “miracle” growth that has made China the world’s second-largest economy, and a challenger to the United States in economic and strategic clout. A modified script may now need to be written.

One subscription. Two world-class reads.

Already subscribed? Log in

Subscribe to read the full story →
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

Disclaimer: These are personal views of the writer. They do not necessarily reflect the opinion of www.business-standard.com or the Business Standard newspaper

Topics :EvergrandeWeekend RuminationsChinese economyhousingcredit growth Global economyEmerging marketsT N Ninan

Next Story