Flag for follow up

Email at the weekends can be a bothersome distraction for busy executives trying to live a full life. For James Murdoch, a message sent to him by the editor of the News of the World one Saturday more than three years ago is proving very troublesome for his work-life balance.

Murdoch is fighting allegations that he has long known about phone hacking went beyond one rogue reporter at the Sunday tabloid, for which he was responsible as head of News Corporation’s European businesses. A problematic email sent one weekend in June 2008 has now shed new light on the matter. True, the email does not contain hard evidence that voicemail interception was common practice or that Murdoch knew that. But, it still tarnishes Murdoch’s defence that he didn’t know hacking went beyond one reporter until late 2010.

First, consider the tardy disclosure of this new evidence. The email was unearthed by a special internal committee investigating the phone-hacking affair. It is astonishing that Murdoch himself didn’t divulge this much earlier, given how many questions were being asked. How hard is it to sort one’s emails by sender and date and go through the ones from key players at the critical moments?

Then, there’s the question of Murdoch’s behaviour on receiving the email. Circumstantial evidence supports his claim that he didn’t scroll down below the primary message, a request for a meeting about a civil phone-hacking case that was turning out “as bad as feared”. Murdoch replied within four minutes, agreeing to meet in person in the working week. So, it looks like he was parking the issue.

But, it should have been clear this was a serious matter which demanded more attention immediately — even if Murdoch was reading the email on his BlackBerry, as he says he typically did on weekends. By finishing the email chain, Murdoch would have learnt that the plaintiff was keen to allege in court that phone-hacking was “rife” at the News of the World, never mind that there was no evidence in this particular email backing that claim.

Some 44 per cent of independent shareholders in BSkyB did not vote for Murdoch’s reelection as chairman of the satellite broadcaster. These latest twists won’t help prevent that opposition becoming the majority view among outside shareholders.