Inside story

China insider expos? is explosive and predictable

Image
John Foley
Last Updated : Feb 05 2013 | 9:26 PM IST

Fix one problem, and along comes another. On the day China expelled disgraced politician Bo Xilai from its parliament, a New York Times investigation alleged that Premier Wen Jiabao’s family controls financial assets worth $2.7 billion. The suggestion is explosive, particularly of a leader who has spoken out about inequality. But it is also mundane, and won’t much change the calculus for investors in the People’s Republic.

With only around three weeks until Wen steps down from his party post, the risk that this becomes a social hot potato is slight. China’s censorship machine works as efficiently as ever: visits to The New York Times website were swiftly blocked. Blog users discussed the story, but only in euphemism, referring to Wen by names like ‘Wo Jia Baobao’ – ‘My baby’. Though the details are juicy, the idea that China’s elite are very rich is hardly surprising.

For investors, it might even be reassuring. Many have staked large sums of money on backing entrepreneurs with connections. Private equity firms, and Western investment banks, have made billions of dollars from pre-IPO investments struck by knowing the right people.

There is thus no contradiction in the fact that China is the world’s top destination for foreign direct investment, with $59 billion in the first half of 2012, according to United Nations data. Investors worry less about unorthodox systems and insiders than they do about unpredictability. India, by contrast, struggles to attract investment because its unpredictable and pervasive corruption is far less conducive to healthy returns.

True, the long-term effect on the economy is corrosive. China lost $3.8 trillion in the past decade through capital flight, suggests a report from Global Financial Integrity – far more than it attracted in foreign investment. And outsiders – including investors in the public markets – are short-changed. That might explain why stocks in Shanghai and Shenzhen look cheap on most measures.

For now though, China’s system is one that many large investors feel they can work with. Even regular folk have developed coping strategies. Consider this year’s civil service examinations, which are on course to attract a record number of applicants – in some cases with 9000 applications for a single post. That power breeds money is China’s worst kept secret.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Oct 27 2012 | 12:12 AM IST

Next Story