Surjit Bhalla is being hard on RBI on specious grounds in “RBI 1, Subbarao 0” (July 31). He is against the tightening of monetary policy. It is understandable. Given the inverse relationship between the yields and prices of bonds, there is a conflict of interest when an investment banker analyses data and makes policy recommendations. Can he cite a single instance when he advocated the raising of the interest rate? The answer will prove or disprove the hypothesis stated above. It will not need any statistical test of significance! Quite likely, the reply will be a deafening silence!
There are irrelevant comparisons and inappropriate use of statistics in the article. There is no comparison between the US and India. In the US, “core inflation” that excludes food and fuel is a matter of concern. For us, these excluded items constitute the core of the problem. There is no reference to the consumer price index in India which affects the aam admi who has to pay Rs 15 for a capsicum or Rs 2-3 for a single banana or lemon. Obviously, the author does not visit any market other than the financial one. Can we comfort the citizen with the statistics on GDP deflator or seasonalised indices? It’s what he pays that is actually relevant and important to him, not all the statistical jugglery that an analyst with an agenda can trot out. Incidentally, RBI uses multiple indicators in its analysis, and not just wholesale price indexor IIP.
The economy is awash with liquidity. I have estimated in an article elsewhere that over the last quarter century, an excess of more than Rs 30 lakh crore has been created vis-à-vis the demand for money, even making a liberal assumption about the relative income elasticity. The middle class has been priced out of the market for housing, on one hand, and vegetables and fruit, on the other, despite all the tightening measures that the central bank periodically carries out.
RBI has clearly pointed out that there is evidence to show that capacity limits are being reached. Despite all the Plans, the economy is still a hostage to the monsoon. RBI has to walk a tightrope in balancing growth with inflation. It’s the government and RBI, and not the analysts, who are answerable to the public.
A Seshan, on email
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
