Markets for farmers

Poor regulation of rural markets benefits only intermediaries

Image
Business Satndard New Delhi
Last Updated : Jan 21 2013 | 12:12 AM IST

While New Delhi’s Krishi Bhawan has good reason for urging states that do not have an agricultural produce market committee (APMC) Act to put in place a proper regulatory mechanism for agricultural markets, the fact also is that the APMC laws where they exist have not always been helpful instruments of market regulation. The concept of legally mandated regulation of agricultural markets, aimed at encouraging the orderly growth of farm marketing infrastructure and ensuring fair trade practices, has not worked as intended. It has not enabled the growth of an efficient marketing infrastructure, nor has it prevented unfair trade practices. In fact, the fence has been eating the field and market committees have been abetting unfair trade practices, hurting both producers and consumers. The beneficiary is the intermediary.

Farmers are being denied the right to sell their produce outside mandis and directly to consumers, retailers or food processors. Apart from the APMC Act, other outmoded laws and rules, including the retrograde Essential Commodities Act, allow various kinds of controls such as movement restrictions, stock limits and bans or caps on the export and import of agro-goods. Many of these interventions lead to market distortions if not failure.

It was the consciousness of these deficiencies that prompted the central government some years ago to circulate a draft model APMC law, as a guide for states to follow. This provided for setting up agricultural markets in the private and/or cooperative sectors, allowing direct marketing and contract marketing, and waiving the market fee for perishable horticultural commodities, something that does not prevent reasonable user charges being levied for availing market facilities. Though the majority of states have amended their APMC legislation, many of the altered statutes do not conform to the spirit of the model APMC law. For instance, they still do not offer freedom to farmers and food processors or retailers to enter into direct deals, in or outside the mandis. This is essential if transactions costs are to be lowered.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Sep 13 2011 | 12:44 AM IST

Next Story